Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-157922-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 139.178.88.99 as permitted sender) client-ip=139.178.88.99;
From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
To: "James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
        Avri Altman <avri.altman@wdc.com>
Cc: "Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
        Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>, Bean Huo <beanhuo@micron.com>,
        linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/1] Remove support for legacy UFS
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 21:57:01 -0400
Message-ID: <171362345479.571343.1760746828189584636.b4-ty@oracle.com>
In-Reply-To: <20240410183720.908-1-avri.altman@wdc.com>
References: <20240410183720.908-1-avri.altman@wdc.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

On Wed, 10 Apr 2024 21:37:18 +0300, Avri Altman wrote:

> UFS1.0 and UFS1.1, published in the early 2010s, were more of a proof of
> concept rather than a mature functional spec. Toshiba was the only
> device manufacturer with the most accomplished phy team to come up with
> a small UFS1.0 device. Alas, there were no commercial platforms it can
> be paired with. Even UFS2.0 that was published in 2013, didn't really
> make it to the market: too moot to take effect. It's not until UFS2.1
> that was published in 2016, were a myriad of devices and platforms
> flooded the market. Designated to mobile devices, dictates a rapid short
> lives for those platforms. Hence, we can safely remove those pre-UFS2.0
> pieces of code.
> 
> [...]

Applied to 6.10/scsi-queue, thanks!

[1/1] scsi: ufs: Remove support for old UFSHCI versions
      https://git.kernel.org/mkp/scsi/c/a33a502d50fd

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering