Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-158068-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 139.178.88.99 as permitted sender) client-ip=139.178.88.99;
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20240416043225.1462548-1-kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> <2aff18aa-32b7-4092-8235-aead9b708ea0@linux.intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <2aff18aa-32b7-4092-8235-aead9b708ea0@linux.intel.com>
From: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 14:26:34 +0800
Message-ID: <CAAd53p7e5dWEsSdrvpZ_5b9LLrhVwQEChUkFityN_nOuT2K=zQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/3] PCI: Add helper to check if any of ancestor device
 support D3cold
To: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Cc: bhelgaas@google.com, mahesh@linux.ibm.com, oohall@gmail.com, 
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, 
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, bagasdotme@gmail.com, 
	regressions@lists.linux.dev, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, kch@nvidia.com, 
	hch@lst.de, gloriouseggroll@gmail.com, kbusch@kernel.org, sagi@grimberg.me, 
	hare@suse.de
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 9:15=E2=80=AFAM Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 4/15/24 9:32 PM, Kai-Heng Feng wrote:
> > In addition to nearest upstream bridge, driver may want to know if the
> > entire hierarchy can be powered off to perform different action.
> >
> > So walk higher up the hierarchy to find out if any device has valid
> > _PR3.
> >
> > The user will be introduced in next patch.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>
> > ---
>
> Since it has been a while, I was not sure what this series is about.
>
> IMO, it is better to include a cover letter with the summary of your
> changes.

OK, will do in next revision.

>
>
> > v8:
> >  - No change.
> >
> >  drivers/pci/pci.c   | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> >  include/linux/pci.h |  2 ++
> >  2 files changed, 18 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> > index e5f243dd4288..7a5662f116b8 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> > @@ -6225,6 +6225,22 @@ bool pci_pr3_present(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> >               acpi_has_method(adev->handle, "_PR3");
> >  }
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_pr3_present);
> > +
> > +bool pci_ancestor_pr3_present(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> > +{
> > +     struct pci_dev *parent =3D pdev;
> > +
> > +     if (acpi_disabled)
> > +             return false;
> > +
> > +     while ((parent =3D pci_upstream_bridge(parent))) {
> > +             if (pci_pr3_present(pdev))
>
> I think it should be "parent" here?

Thanks for catching this.

But this patch will be dropped in next version for better simplicity.

Kai-Heng

>
> > +                     return true;
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     return false;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_ancestor_pr3_present);
> >  #endif
> >
> >  /**
> > diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h
> > index 16493426a04f..cd71ebfd0f89 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/pci.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/pci.h
> > @@ -2620,10 +2620,12 @@ struct irq_domain *pci_host_bridge_acpi_msi_dom=
ain(struct pci_bus *bus);
> >  void
> >  pci_msi_register_fwnode_provider(struct fwnode_handle *(*fn)(struct de=
vice *));
> >  bool pci_pr3_present(struct pci_dev *pdev);
> > +bool pci_ancestor_pr3_present(struct pci_dev *pdev);
> >  #else
> >  static inline struct irq_domain *
> >  pci_host_bridge_acpi_msi_domain(struct pci_bus *bus) { return NULL; }
> >  static inline bool pci_pr3_present(struct pci_dev *pdev) { return fals=
e; }
> > +static inline bool pci_ancestor_pr3_present(struct pci_dev *pdev) { re=
turn false; }
> >  #endif
> >
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_EEH
>
> --
> Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
> Linux Kernel Developer
>