Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-158134-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 139.178.88.99 as permitted sender) client-ip=139.178.88.99;
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 09:34:11 +0200
From: Robert Richter <rrichter@amd.com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/7] SRAT/CEDT fixes and updates
Message-ID: <ZioHc_L5PxvrMNaP@rric.localdomain>
References: <20240424154846.2152750-1-rrichter@amd.com>
 <66294584e3869_b6e0294c5@dwillia2-mobl3.amr.corp.intel.com.notmuch>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <66294584e3869_b6e0294c5@dwillia2-mobl3.amr.corp.intel.com.notmuch>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount: 1
X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:
	=?us-ascii?Q?AZIrkvbulsJ10EeKyHCWDdLMFm0n56+lymEKSh0qXfMUezTnzQr73lt8sy/1?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?XXAAiLO44XkFcAnyQrvyEbPPGOrSQpid+0FB8TQB1hQkZN1stNf4uoqqdO+Y?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?tyhqr3WA6jatydwNQrAebc3PtkFwBJUJ1vsGVvLUKs53TbzQGC/fF5TS3hPJ?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?LTZuDX8014k91T91bBKKfs0OqYsa3tFp+Fr8xxuHKcDlWwIMRqsUteghgnos?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?uUc5h6PA0/t6xHLKo+0wJ7zkb7NjuCmg5WflkQfpwxgN42jddX+Kuak3b8Xx?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?KGHK58As1UvWZLnljSen6ERaarzNaJ0YG5RvHlpzhIezVQfAfb8tvnsawBei?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?FqEjxvsnScHRnAE8Ehqyiu0VIFuEEMsDWtVfltCWRwUz55Tv7oBJjKXDaeNy?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?p5WuxOuu8ZWtDNmddWzKy+Kms3N5WocGBPuweNQXsVDK3CtkiL1r6xlXdksv?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?Kxcn9qhJYnkwCoY6JmggH+lMIvOKgYa+DBn4+wcVb4C3GBvtG8dLi7l5Y3mQ?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?xavp+11Dn0RSQvT1ko4swu8BUuabxLMVfY5B3vUAc0hzo2zvrMcNjdOFCcsq?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?RJuQCknW+pOjTR3wSCSEeGIfyo0pdbDIsgjZ/GFFsHxXWOgvcogUbZ3iNA8j?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?paoqGuxm4xYsQZIa4RQbmnta99pvsVtDHer5/lxzSCKtazpPoc/UEjf4qhlR?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?k6MoZsqoKAUizMANtFZULzfUEbKwjna7v8d0qVPJnFUbiogBHjqOcvf7RI/Z?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?UUpItAXGXjbtdVPeMTl8ifZZPueJxLjLIWBLSOuDwyBtp4syPtLJ01vsRqyR?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?O1GUbzn7EARZxxyP7TsD07hPxdbEz7BPijAnnNG3Eo04XjxonFIb/AdgbVwy?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?B3VoY9aSLcGra8bgt1YMb1HO9P1jmw0kLpfcHIMCU/Ojat1K5G+phwzPH0PG?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?AZvi9AMks+HoEx7fs0hbFcntcGQvBfhVmtB4LAk6F6wwYcszYNJXx56NbVK6?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?jmFLZ2jFT63GberXQpLcZK/SJg9Df5Sg0Zf8N72sP9IOH3wbTfckqVDAvKiW?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?PpJohbuyXOAotBtu0Hd26qgJeq3dGgDSkcqwXKUIwnFhxQ6NY6g7cppkaheD?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?O03NnN3SoSiqkZrREx/7Mr9N5PJpblzTP4uuhwoqq4N1+Tl2k5wNizNcHm1o?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?y7/MoMkvkn5aOKExzsw/1PtK2jEpd+w82FCo3kvLge4Jfu0hMOcvVWEmeB/O?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?4KnEseElC2wE1BwYnCRX2x137VgFHpGitiwzCYAL1rEdsdr/HsDP+oP9uaHy?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?y2PS0vN4vqugAmPt2rlMVeopJjLcgWohCrsVadJjeaqBW85yIy7hnVYgC0Pq?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?g3SEHK/dwtqD8ULOqoPEcBANLFZeBARQqkxDQB8fZKPsaAcy/uQotZJJ9QqR?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?tCy+KfpNPNmHvXoT6QjUeOCz6lEtjBdTUkhKBI6U3FPHw9THwC5lXczkqrXz?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?KjVH+fyAr27j3jupSUU/HJQyOrqASPGlAa3pOiaoXhdnKKhZrkM3k1l3lhqq?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?MtMiraM+rcC3hvO3ZqiJPy2Rt2a1l0M9Smhxx8vY?=
X-OriginatorOrg: amd.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 9f295082-d324-4626-f7e8-08dc64fa1cfe
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: CYYPR12MB8750.namprd12.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Apr 2024 07:34:17.1757
 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 3dd8961f-e488-4e60-8e11-a82d994e183d
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-MailboxType: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-UserPrincipalName: q0G+9pPnkX/OJhDqFZa4dyDaL+jh3ObAic8Nl/ph0IGmtms2+H/GmwIrZJYJl3BvK/b2N0cn3FcoSW7g7dQfoQ==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: PH8PR12MB6675

On 24.04.24 10:46:44, Dan Williams wrote:
> Robert Richter wrote:
> > Some fixes and updates for SRAT/CEDT parsing code. Patches can be
> > applied individually and are independent.
> > 
> > First patch fixes a page fault during boot. It should be marked
> > stable.
> > 
> > 2nd patch reworks the code around numa_fill_memblks() (Dan's
> > suggestion).
> 
> Just squash these 2 together. The -stable maintainers continue to assert
> that fixes should do the right thing by mainline mainline standards and
> let the -stable backport process decide if a different change needs to
> be made for older kernels. I see no benefit for tracking 2 changes for
> how numa_fill_memblks() is defined.

Ok, will drop #1 in a v5.

Thanks,

-Robert