Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-158411-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1;
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 12:46:24 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>, x86@kernel.org,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>, Bingsong Si <sibs@chinatelecom.cn>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 29/71] x86/cpu/intel: Switch to new Intel CPU model
 defines
Message-ID: <20240425104624.GCZio0gDJABGjzoan1@fat_crate.local>
References: <20240424181245.41141-1-tony.luck@intel.com>
 <20240424181508.41713-1-tony.luck@intel.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20240424181508.41713-1-tony.luck@intel.com>

On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 11:15:08AM -0700, Tony Luck wrote:
> +static bool vfm_match(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c, u32 vfm)
> +{
> +	return c->x86_vendor == VFM_VENDOR(vfm) &&
> +	       c->x86 == VFM_FAMILY(vfm) &&
> +	       c->x86_model == VFM_MODEL(vfm);
> +}

Why is that one here?

It looks generic enough to put it in asm/processor.h so that it can get
used elsewhere too instead of homegrowing things again...

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette