Received: by 2002:a89:48b:0:b0:1f5:f2ab:c469 with SMTP id a11csp1156293lqd; Thu, 25 Apr 2024 07:31:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=2; AJvYcCXzU4darDM5TvbDuoPG4BFAPvEDQtGbZG7+KrDhCS86GDx6vcdVX6ud9wgtN73G0vVZUFafMOg9nJqFLDlOMSGqNtBNBgNRmto7rSEibA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGkXtIcyinwz38Hdv2NMzLzhu6IQ+znaejqcF/iGCZJUPsZkMPPeO+/rJWk6ze0FgRPg+45 X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:306:b0:43a:3fdf:eaff with SMTP id q6-20020a05622a030600b0043a3fdfeaffmr2497076qtw.51.1714055489056; Thu, 25 Apr 2024 07:31:29 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from ny.mirrors.kernel.org (ny.mirrors.kernel.org. [147.75.199.223]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id dh5-20020a05622a4e0500b00434a267ddafsi16337972qtb.588.2024.04.25.07.31.28 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 25 Apr 2024 07:31:29 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-158718-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.199.223 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.199.223; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@armlinux.org.uk header.s=pandora-2019 header.b=jLH72VqO; arc=fail (body hash mismatch); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-158718-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.199.223 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-158718-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=armlinux.org.uk Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ny.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B4F211C22CA5 for ; Thu, 25 Apr 2024 14:31:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A3DA14A4F7; Thu, 25 Apr 2024 14:31:18 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=armlinux.org.uk header.i=@armlinux.org.uk header.b="jLH72VqO" Received: from pandora.armlinux.org.uk (pandora.armlinux.org.uk [78.32.30.218]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CEF8512C47C; Thu, 25 Apr 2024 14:31:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=78.32.30.218 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1714055477; cv=none; b=pdf8aTD0efttSyTBc30F73nn4Zw18SvI57KvQ5mx5rnkZhklwlzWAKItLBQuDpGqQy1hsD15lBELRmuPd1vO7Du0R9rEW94+1ZVVYvR1DojdGnKPoNPw/FB3oOON+BV2TCYyUhFlLZjhtarxkqIJQtDKZzR1xHKQp2jDDCvYQwE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1714055477; c=relaxed/simple; bh=XNDONZ50zkNw24VHGSrLtBVRo25TyhBYrvxwY6adhPA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=huMQSaWQt86n6eHp4G82uX/osamrxeoz8+ZwFLomUFexmCK/TOBa7t8kmNUcUI2aCMmFsDHWU4Y/EXYN2oAGPKgoXfxXlpCN5h4XkF2JiVXsLD3mMsE9Y9COR9SOWLMAn5AnBX8m7BNTF1VU3WrKRlGco5Ur/8ZlqcAWy82wIVc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=armlinux.org.uk; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=armlinux.org.uk; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=armlinux.org.uk header.i=@armlinux.org.uk header.b=jLH72VqO; arc=none smtp.client-ip=78.32.30.218 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=armlinux.org.uk Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=armlinux.org.uk DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=armlinux.org.uk; s=pandora-2019; h=Sender:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=bhEOlHPHwzer5w9ZMmE08QQPlZ3NpIRrXVu+LpBumv4=; b=jLH72VqOH3gpURD01C2ne9BQzQ vEWyeN+NPnbnu9rYbatMXdAw8ipHOyXtQ3jDk8Fp5vCppyACBIitFV4SsNvQzO/6LjE82J4cBIc7O tesZD3ULKMHXIlVheHZuB96S3iZ0xubXxt6mkZyCDQfmTe2Bv93Smty/RhFLom3JekduJ7WUuFPow jvowSjItxO6DtyotKyAm7HLiJFUJxxRG3HIuXFMYJe3cKLysaTNsjoFg51oRC7Q+GOrRzrcZJl0ST NJ+QAABshwCgu8JVyQeD5/JW9Heij6jENzc/kvGkLq/spz3WUvmpcOUGLjEzyfJFUPUnubWPOISqb 8vN+3Npw==; Received: from shell.armlinux.org.uk ([fd8f:7570:feb6:1:5054:ff:fe00:4ec]:44198) by pandora.armlinux.org.uk with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1s007j-0007WW-1L; Thu, 25 Apr 2024 15:30:55 +0100 Received: from linux by shell.armlinux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1s007g-0005ea-OW; Thu, 25 Apr 2024 15:30:52 +0100 Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 15:30:52 +0100 From: "Russell King (Oracle)" To: Stefan Eichenberger Cc: Andrew Lunn , davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, robh@kernel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, lxu@maxlinear.com, hkallweit1@gmail.com, michael@walle.cc, netdev@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] net: phy: mxl-gpy: add new device tree property to disable SGMII autoneg Message-ID: References: <5ed39628-4ac0-4c4e-9a16-fd4bf9a6db29@lunn.ch> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: Russell King (Oracle) On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 01:24:51PM +0200, Stefan Eichenberger wrote: > On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 07:13:35PM +0100, Russell King (Oracle) wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 05:56:47PM +0200, Stefan Eichenberger wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 03:58:00PM +0100, Russell King (Oracle) wrote: > > > > On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 04:01:59PM +0100, Russell King (Oracle) wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 09:22:50AM +0200, Stefan Eichenberger wrote: > > > > > > I also checked the datasheet and you are right about the 1000base-X mode > > > > > > and in-band AN. What worked for us so far was to use SGMII mode even for > > > > > > 2.5Gbps and disable in-band AN (which is possible for SGMII). I think > > > > > > this works because as you wrote, the genphy just multiplies the clock by > > > > > > 2.5 and doesn't care if it's 1000base-X or SGMII. With your patches we > > > > > > might even be able to use in-band autonegoation for 10,100 and 1000Mbps > > > > > > and then just disable it for 2.5Gbps. I need to test it, but I have hope > > > > > > that this should work. > > > > > > > > > > There is another way we could address this. If the querying support > > > > > had a means to identify that the endpoint supports bypass mode, we > > > > > could then have phylink identify that, and arrange to program the > > > > > mvpp2 end to be in 1000base-X + x2.5 clock + AN bypass, which would > > > > > mean it wouldn't require the inband 16-bit word to be present. > > > > > > > > > > I haven't fully thought it through yet - for example, I haven't > > > > > considered how we should indicate to the PCS that AN bypass mode > > > > > should be enabled or disabled via the pcs_config() method. > > > > > > > > Okay, I've been trying to put more effort into this, but it's been slow > > > > progress (sorry). > > > > > > > > My thoughts from a design point of view were that we could just switch > > > > to PHYLINK_PCS_NEG_OUTBAND instead of PHYLINK_PCS_NEG_INBAND_* and > > > > everything at the PCS layer should be able to cope, but this is not the > > > > case, especially with mvneta/mvpp2. > > > > > > > > The problem is that mvneta/mvpp2 (and probably more) expect that > > > > > > > > 1) MLO_AN_INBAND means that the PCS will be using inband, and that > > > > means the link up/down state won't be forced. This basically implies > > > > that only PHYLINK_PCS_NEG_INBAND_* can be used can be used for the > > > > PCS. > > > > > > > > 2) !MLO_AN_INBAND means that an out-of-band mechanism will be used and > > > > that means that the link needs to be forced (since there's no way > > > > for the hardware to know whether the link should be up or down.) > > > > It's therefore expected that only PHYLINK_PCS_NEG_OUTBAND will be > > > > used for the PCS. > > > > > > > > So, attempting to put a resolution of the PHY and PCS abilities into > > > > phylink_pcs_neg_mode() and select the appropriate PHYLINK_PCS_NEG_* > > > > mode alone just doesn't work. Yet... we need to do that in there when > > > > considering whether inband can be enabled or not for non-PHY links. > > > > > > > > Basically, it needs a re-think how to solve this... > > > > > > Today I was playing around with my combination of mxl-gpy and mvpp2 and > > > I got it working again with your patches applied. However, I hacked the > > > phylink driver to only rely on what the phy and pcs support. I know this > > > is not a proper solution, but it allowed me to verify the other changes. > > > My idea was if the phy and pcs support inband then use it, otherwise use > > > outband and ignore the rest. > > > > > > Here is how my minimal phylink_pcs_neg_mode test function looks like: > > > > > > static unsigned int phylink_pcs_neg_mode(struct phylink *pl, > > > struct phylink_pcs *pcs, > > > unsigned int mode, > > > phy_interface_t interface, > > > const unsigned long *advertising) > > > { > > > unsigned int phy_link_mode = 0; > > > unsigned int pcs_link_mode; > > > > > > pcs_link_mode = phylink_pcs_query_inband(pcs, interface); > > > if (pl->phydev) > > > phy_link_mode = phy_query_inband(pl->phydev, interface); > > > > > > /* If the PCS or PHY can not provide inband, then use > > > * outband. > > > */ > > > if (!(pcs_link_mode & LINK_INBAND_VALID) || > > > !(phy_link_mode & LINK_INBAND_VALID)) > > > return PHYLINK_PCS_NEG_OUTBAND; > > > > > > return PHYLINK_PCS_NEG_INBAND_ENABLED; > > > } > > > > Note that I've changed the flags that get reported to be disable (bit 0)/ > > enable (bit 1) rather than valid/possible/required because the former > > makes the resolution easier. > > > > The problem is that merely returning outband doesn't cause mvneta/mvpp2 > > to force the link up. So for example, here's a SFP module which doesn't > > support any inband for 2500base-X nor SGMII: > > > > mvneta f1034000.ethernet eno2: copper SFP: interfaces=[mac=4,9-12,19,22-23, sfp= > > 4,23,27] > > mvneta f1034000.ethernet eno2: copper SFP: chosen 2500base-x interface > > mvneta f1034000.ethernet eno2: PHY i2c:sfp:16 uses interfaces 4,23,27, validatin > > g 4,23 > > mvneta f1034000.ethernet eno2: interface 4 (sgmii) rate match none supports 2-3 > > ,5-6,13 > > mvneta f1034000.ethernet eno2: interface 23 (2500base-x) rate match none suppor > > ts 6,13,47 > > mvneta f1034000.ethernet eno2: PHY [i2c:sfp:16] driver [Broadcom BCM84881] (irq= > > POLL) > > mvneta f1034000.ethernet eno2: phy: 2500base-x setting supported 00,00000000,000 > > 08000,0000206c advertising 00,00000000,00008000,0000206c > > mvneta f1034000.ethernet eno2: copper SFP: PHY link in-band modes 0x1 > > mvneta f1034000.ethernet eno2: major config 2500base-x > > mvneta f1034000.ethernet eno2: link modes: pcs=02 phy=01 > > mvneta f1034000.ethernet eno2: phylink_mac_config: mode=inband/2500base-x/none a > > dv=00,00000000,00008000,0000206c pause=04 > > mvneta f1034000.ethernet eno2: phylink_sfp_module_start() > > mvneta f1034000.ethernet eno2: phylink_sfp_link_up() > > mvneta f1034000.ethernet eno2: phy link down 2500base-x/Unknown/Unknown/none/off > > mvneta f1034000.ethernet eno2: phy link up sgmii/1Gbps/Full/none/off > > mvneta f1034000.ethernet eno2: major config sgmii > > mvneta f1034000.ethernet eno2: link modes: pcs=03 phy=01 > > mvneta f1034000.ethernet eno2: phylink_mac_config: mode=inband/sgmii/none adv=00,00000000,00008000,0000206c pause=00 > > mvneta f1034000.ethernet eno2: pcs link down > > mvneta f1034000.ethernet eno2: pcs link down > > mvneta f1034000.ethernet eno2: can LPI, EEE enabled, active > > mvneta f1034000.ethernet eno2: enabling tx_lpi, timer 250us > > mvneta f1034000.ethernet eno2: Link is Up - 1Gbps/Full - flow control off > > > > This looks like the link is up, but it isn't - note "pcs link down". > > If we look at the value of the GMAC AN status register: > > > > Value at address 0xf1036c10: 0x0000600a > > > > which indicates that the link is down, so no packets will pass. > > What I changed in mvpp2 is to allow turing off inband in 2500base-x. The > mvpp2 driver can handle this use case in pcs_config, it will turn off AN > and force the link up. pcs_config can't force the link up. > I think it should also work for mvneta, at least > the code looks almost the same. I get the following for the Port > Auto-Negotiation Configuration Register: > > For 1Gbit/s it switches to SGMII and enables inband AN: > Memory mapped at address 0xffffa0112000. > Value at address 0xF2132E0C (0xffffa0112e0c): 0xB0C6 So here the link is forced up which is wrong for inband, because then we have no way to detect the link going down. > For 2.5Gbit/s it disables inband AN and forces the link to be up: > Memory mapped at address 0xffffaff88000. > Value at address 0xF2132E0C (0xffffaff88e0c): 0x9042 > > Then the status register shows also link up for 2.5Gbit/s: > Memory mapped at address 0xffffa5fe2000. > Value at address 0xF2132E10 (0xffffa5fe2e10): 0x683B > > What might be confusing is that the port type, bit 1 in MAC Control > Register0, is set to SGMII for 2.5Gbit/s, because we can only turn off > autonegotiation for SGMII: > Memory mapped at address 0xffff8c26c000. > Value at address 0xF2132E00 (0xffff8c26ce00): 0x8BFD Control register 0 bit 1 is the port type bit, which controls whether the port is in "1000base-X" mode or SGMII mode. This has no effect on the interpretation of the inband control word. Control register 2 bit 0 controls whether the port uses 802.3z format control words or SGMII format control words. > My example patch still uses the old macros: > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvpp2/mvpp2_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvpp2/mvpp2_main.c > index 97e38f61ac65..15fadfd61313 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvpp2/mvpp2_main.c > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvpp2/mvpp2_main.c > @@ -6223,9 +6223,12 @@ static unsigned int mvpp2_gmac_pcs_query_inband(struct phylink_pcs *pcs, > * When = 1 (1000BASE-X) this field must be set to 1. > * Therefore, inband is "required". > */ > - if (phy_interface_mode_is_8023z(interface)) > + if (interface == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_1000BASEX) > return LINK_INBAND_VALID | LINK_INBAND_REQUIRED; > > + if (interface == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_2500BASEX) > + return LINK_INBAND_VALID | LINK_INBAND_POSSIBLE; This is not correct though. If we set PortType = 1, then this applies: Bit Field Type / InitVal Description 2 InBandAnEn RW In-band Auto-Negotiation enable. .. When = 1 (1000BASE-X) this field must be set to 1. When = 0 (SGMII) and this field is 1, in-band Flow Control not supported. So, if we have the port in 1000base-X mode (PortType = 1) then bit 2 of the Autoneg configuration register needs to be set to be compliant with the documentation. Therefore, since we set PortType = 1 for 2500BASE-X (and note that I _do_ run 2500BASE-X with inband AN enabled over fibre transceivers here, so this is needed), we also need to enable InBandAnEn. This is exactly where the difficulty comes - because what you're suggesting will break currently working setups such as what I have here. Switching the port to SGMII mode for 2500base-X doesn't sound like a sensible thing to do. -- RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!