Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-158954-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.199.223 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.199.223;
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 18:11:02 +0100
From: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
To: Tomasz Jeznach <tjeznach@rivosinc.com>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
	Anup Patel <apatel@ventanamicro.com>,
	Sunil V L <sunilvl@ventanamicro.com>,
	Nick Kossifidis <mick@ics.forth.gr>,
	Sebastien Boeuf <seb@rivosinc.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux@rivosinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] dt-bindings: iommu: riscv: Add bindings for
 RISC-V IOMMU
Message-ID: <20240425-nursing-ground-7a3f92120058@spud>
References: <cover.1713456597.git.tjeznach@rivosinc.com>
 <c37cb93e7baa7042a3f82130bf30be6831b558dc.1713456598.git.tjeznach@rivosinc.com>
 <20240418-approach-liquefy-04551ddefbc4@spud>
 <CAH2o1u7_v=_GX5cnV5X14jggTycRTvGEJ1r_9tqtb-xgk=LEkA@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Swwc95+Q8CpAtvFV"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAH2o1u7_v=_GX5cnV5X14jggTycRTvGEJ1r_9tqtb-xgk=LEkA@mail.gmail.com>


--Swwc95+Q8CpAtvFV
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 03:37:14PM -0700, Tomasz Jeznach wrote:
> Makes sense.  Will update to something like below:
>   compatible:
>     oneOf:
>       - items:
>           - enum:
>               - qemu,iommu
>           - const: riscv,iommu
>       - items:
>           - enum:
>               - pci1efd,edf1
>           - const: riscv,pci-iommu

That seems reasonable to me, addresses both what Rob and I pointed out.

Thanks,
Conor.

--Swwc95+Q8CpAtvFV
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iHUEABYIAB0WIQRh246EGq/8RLhDjO14tDGHoIJi0gUCZiqOpgAKCRB4tDGHoIJi
0iOwAP9rRgNUMnh8lOU9vNTRQerc6pb2yB1UEPBpVUg2JN4ahwD/fUj0t4ghfeIS
Nh5gnWL7xHYspUt3P4f/ljOrutHJywY=
=6/MB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Swwc95+Q8CpAtvFV--