Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 4 Jan 2002 17:17:15 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 4 Jan 2002 17:17:06 -0500 Received: from h24-64-71-161.cg.shawcable.net ([24.64.71.161]:65021 "EHLO lynx.adilger.int") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 4 Jan 2002 17:16:17 -0500 Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 15:15:13 -0700 From: Andreas Dilger To: Bryan Henderson Cc: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl, acme@conectiva.com.br, ion@cs.columbia.edu, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, phillips@bonn-fries.net Subject: Re: [CFT] [JANITORIAL] Unbork fs.h Message-ID: <20020104151513.Y12868@lynx.no> Mail-Followup-To: Bryan Henderson , Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl, acme@conectiva.com.br, ion@cs.columbia.edu, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, phillips@bonn-fries.net In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.4i In-Reply-To: ; from hbryan@us.ibm.com on Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 09:45:04AM -0700 X-GPG-Key: 1024D/0D35BED6 X-GPG-Fingerprint: 7A37 5D79 BF1B CECA D44F 8A29 A488 39F5 0D35 BED6 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Jan 04, 2002 09:45 -0700, Bryan Henderson wrote: > >> sizeof (foo): 1611, sizeof(foo): 19364 => -bs should be removed > >> ... > >> int > >> foo(int x): 11408, int foo(int x): 57275 => -psl should be removed > > > >I do not think good style is best defined by majority vote. > > I don't think the implication was that sizeof(foo) is better style because > more people like it. The implication is that consistency is, in general, > good programming style and it's easier to arrive at consistency by adhering > to the majority style than by adhering to the minority style. That was my goal. > And I don't see what any of this has to do with whether an option should be > removed from Lindent. Lindent should be a tool, which means it helps a > user do whatever he wants to do. Whether he should want to do "sizeof > (foo)" is a separate issue. Well Lindent != indent. The "indent" program can do formatting to the wishes of the user. However, "Lindent" is a wrapper script which is trying to impose the will of Linus on other kernel programmers, and as such "what the user wants to do" is of no concern. If they don't want to follow the "mandated" coding style, then they just don't use Lindent. Cheers, Andreas -- Andreas Dilger http://sourceforge.net/projects/ext2resize/ http://www-mddsp.enel.ucalgary.ca/People/adilger/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/