Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-159448-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45e3:2400::1;
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/3] net: lan966x: flower: validate control flags
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
Message-Id: 
 <171409922857.17911.8111493422367965592.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 02:40:28 +0000
References: <20240424125347.461995-1-ast@fiberby.net>
In-Reply-To: <20240424125347.461995-1-ast@fiberby.net>
To: =?utf-8?b?QXNiasO4cm4gU2xvdGggVMO4bm5lc2VuIDxhc3RAZmliZXJieS5uZXQ+?=@codeaurora.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, horatiu.vultur@microchip.com,
 UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
 kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
 jiri@resnulli.us, horms@kernel.org

Hello:

This series was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>:

On Wed, 24 Apr 2024 12:53:37 +0000 you wrote:
> This series adds flower control flags validation to the
> lan966x driver, and changes it from assuming that it handles
> all control flags, to instead reject rules if they have
> masked any unknown/unsupported control flags.
> 
> ---
> Changelog:
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [net-next,v2,1/3] net: lan966x: flower: add extack to lan966x_tc_flower_handler_control_usage()
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/505ccf890c21
  - [net-next,v2,2/3] net: lan966x: flower: rename goto in lan966x_tc_flower_handler_control_usage()
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/12b8e129c409
  - [net-next,v2,3/3] net: lan966x: flower: check for unsupported control flags
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/8c65e27b42fc

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html