Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757776AbYA0V0R (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Jan 2008 16:26:17 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754614AbYA0V0H (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Jan 2008 16:26:07 -0500 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:34485 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754452AbYA0V0E (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Jan 2008 16:26:04 -0500 Subject: Re: (ondemand) CPU governor regression between 2.6.23 and 2.6.24 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Toralf =?ISO-8859-1?Q?F=F6rster?= Cc: Mike Galbraith , Sam Ravnborg , Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <200801272214.49928.toralf.foerster@gmx.de> References: <479B69D2.5050603@wpkg.org> <200801271339.14668.toralf.foerster@gmx.de> <1201460328.5092.95.camel@homer.simson.net> <200801272214.49928.toralf.foerster@gmx.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2008 22:25:58 +0100 Message-Id: <1201469158.6149.5.camel@lappy> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.21.5 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 582 Lines: 15 On Sun, 2008-01-27 at 22:14 +0100, Toralf Förster wrote: > Is it correct that within the scenario described above user "A" never gets more > than 50% of the CPU as soon as user "B" is logged into the system (because of > the login process itself) ? No, the login process doesn't normally consume any significant amount of cpu time. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/