Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-159953-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45e3:2400::1;
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 12:48:55 +0100
From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Peter Zijlstra
	<peterz@infradead.org>, <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	<loongarch@lists.linux.dev>, <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, <kvmarm@lists.linux.dev>,
	<x86@kernel.org>, Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>, "Rafael J . Wysocki"
	<rafael@kernel.org>, Miguel Luis <miguel.luis@oracle.com>, "James Morse"
	<james.morse@arm.com>, Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@huawei.com>, Jean-Philippe
 Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>, Catalin Marinas
	<catalin.marinas@arm.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	<linuxarm@huawei.com>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, "Dave
 Hansen" <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>, <justin.he@arm.com>,
	<jianyong.wu@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 08/16] ACPI: Add post_eject to struct
 acpi_scan_handler for cpu hotplug
Message-ID: <20240426124836.00006cde@huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <20240418135412.14730-9-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
References: <20240418135412.14730-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
	<20240418135412.14730-9-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Organization: Huawei Technologies Research and Development (UK) Ltd.
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Thu, 18 Apr 2024 14:54:04 +0100
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> wrote:

> From: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
> 
> struct acpi_scan_handler has a detach callback that is used to remove
> a driver when a bus is changed. When interacting with an eject-request,
> the detach callback is called before _EJ0.
> 
> This means the ACPI processor driver can't use _STA to determine if a
> CPU has been made not-present, or some of the other _STA bits have been
> changed. acpi_processor_remove() needs to know the value of _STA after
> _EJ0 has been called.
> 
> Add a post_eject callback to struct acpi_scan_handler. This is called
> after acpi_scan_hot_remove() has successfully called _EJ0. Because
> acpi_scan_check_and_detach() also clears the handler pointer,
> it needs to be told if the caller will go on to call
> acpi_bus_post_eject(), so that acpi_device_clear_enumerated()
> and clearing the handler pointer can be deferred.
> An extra flag is added to flags field introduced in the previous
> patch to achieve this.
> 
> Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Joanthan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>

Gavin's earlier review showed I can't type.
Fixed up by dropping this RB seeing as I signed off anyway.

> Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
> Tested-by: Miguel Luis <miguel.luis@oracle.com>
> Tested-by: Vishnu Pajjuri <vishnu@os.amperecomputing.com>
> Tested-by: Jianyong Wu <jianyong.wu@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
>