Received: by 2002:a05:7208:b08c:b0:82:bbfa:f723 with SMTP id c12csp376210rbb; Fri, 26 Apr 2024 06:53:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=3; AJvYcCVsWsY+axGWdIHVVlwAm4UQ2Xq7/FjhjqnlS9l9qNd2TTsZGUzwVaJM4hHVSuGJrzF4xlYYIhqmrmcQeEfApzlJ4YKhyGFFmBQjD0bLKw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEqO4lbsBO0njJWqNZR5eu/xI37aGu6HB4ieMw88H8gslC8UPt/BRGXZBEuM7m73K/5qf93 X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:d83:b0:a52:182b:dee9 with SMTP id m3-20020a1709060d8300b00a52182bdee9mr2154376eji.35.1714139633887; Fri, 26 Apr 2024 06:53:53 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; t=1714139633; cv=pass; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=NWpkQ2RIzbzqzvp+8clmopHEg7EF6Rj8I9y5p0VjHxiTqzxiXgFAFkZQofVyd5CzoH 7QJTJhbej5Gr/qUPWOcnK1qxNP9ce+Z0wroH+o/oQUFjDhSw69O9gRytb5mjyZ+mPD0n kbA7DNRy7x7LMbomT+kGC+w4ozl2TaqmAokGwqvUfw3m/qPJAMJVoFlCeD6WHV6fXLGt e1pUhYM9imPF2h6TJn2Xs4+W6jWXugJ+wDx5GLRahitTZSRJJJbOsWAdDiodiedBgGsE viUjfXopeBj6jsYWL0CIPloZKmRI6qnI47s+s4LNpyOsALOoBmjRQQDoR0L4Ice1bKqJ Q6VQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:list-unsubscribe :list-subscribe:list-id:precedence:references:in-reply-to:message-id :date:subject:cc:to:from; bh=rNERIKuy9Yd8OuH2nfn1C/CA05qiZaMzmzWKUEg7v8E=; fh=QfGN+Nlycv3VEqD8X65neWxvyXXboUCZUO7iSMK6eUk=; b=HLxvAJcwH5rBkUrJ1BKL86pKGAlzn4lruyaNJYDnyBN2qBokdZZHnp8louUAOUqWUI z0rbwf25c7G08d+4wcBFe2+uI6pO0es+CNZB/bB3QRtM7REEakKqD9GUpKt6O6bTwSfg +Qz6YlaWVsz7A5MGmk9OhBvAI27AWGsiP/vf9Bd1j8g2/gm4xKzs7/JykwRMm+dtrKH1 VuqtGq6FOpx+Nf7b1tXxtT9VW4uthDuAqQVSCUto5ixeQTKhAgijxpc2RYZbk4ypkLGl jXntBH5keQhlnZZeC1wzexPl/LzFRSHN5zGP5JGFh5Exb87+IPgLb6Epo2vBrXdk85k4 KcIQ==; dara=google.com ARC-Authentication-Results: i=2; mx.google.com; arc=pass (i=1 spf=pass spfdomain=huawei.com dmarc=pass fromdomain=huawei.com); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-160093-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:4601:e00::3 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-160093-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=fail (p=QUARANTINE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=huawei.com Return-Path: Received: from am.mirrors.kernel.org (am.mirrors.kernel.org. [2604:1380:4601:e00::3]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id cf4-20020a170906b2c400b00a558f328a6csi9284299ejb.564.2024.04.26.06.53.53 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 26 Apr 2024 06:53:53 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-160093-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:4601:e00::3 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:4601:e00::3; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; arc=pass (i=1 spf=pass spfdomain=huawei.com dmarc=pass fromdomain=huawei.com); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-160093-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:4601:e00::3 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-160093-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=fail (p=QUARANTINE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=huawei.com Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by am.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B83F1F224EC for ; Fri, 26 Apr 2024 13:53:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD4D01487E5; Fri, 26 Apr 2024 13:53:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1CD3A140389; Fri, 26 Apr 2024 13:53:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1714139613; cv=none; b=ayMyOdTTJXGwIyCT1XSGOGk7xw1P5VhM98awaNg/QGaEkeTaKO85QfeIhDwLmzT8gMwBPCFcrWwusnV69qJBYKYc1DyPEzf+2TfM7acoz1zqoiKxmZqFtHeSFQ7kkVwtPE1fw2CweP7v6PbrcYchqsQKURGy9LBrMgutt8n4p7M= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1714139613; c=relaxed/simple; bh=L4AJqhcz4JyUcgl/balbPTr8ZkFOqiMjxbdfQ3jG8+o=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=WND2S3qIGj+3JXo3SvfmWq9/Swfq6Z1TWg3AImwt7K1nbAKb3eINk3gNvh34sEdEPVRMnbq1ixMENkOL0EMIkLAk+c/fOV+AEinIp8uVR9o9CKBHwyRdoW/i39XjTD/UjbtfGV0qrJ8yZLzzEDm59XGCUB0Fdj22CU3YhGWm/7M= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.216]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4VQvM13cXQz6DB7r; Fri, 26 Apr 2024 21:53:17 +0800 (CST) Received: from lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.191.163.240]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2BC9D140C72; Fri, 26 Apr 2024 21:53:29 +0800 (CST) Received: from SecurePC-101-06.china.huawei.com (10.122.247.231) by lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Fri, 26 Apr 2024 14:53:28 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron To: Thomas Gleixner , Peter Zijlstra , , , , , , , , , Russell King , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Miguel Luis , James Morse , Salil Mehta , Jean-Philippe Brucker , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Marc Zyngier , Hanjun Guo CC: Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , , , , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Sudeep Holla Subject: [PATCH v8 04/16] ACPI: processor: Move checks and availability of acpi_processor earlier Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 14:51:14 +0100 Message-ID: <20240426135126.12802-5-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.2 In-Reply-To: <20240426135126.12802-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> References: <20240426135126.12802-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain X-ClientProxiedBy: lhrpeml500002.china.huawei.com (7.191.160.78) To lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) Make the per_cpu(processors, cpu) entries available earlier so that they are available in arch_register_cpu() as ARM64 will need access to the acpi_handle to distinguish between acpi_processor_add() and earlier registration attempts (which will fail as _STA cannot be checked). Reorder the remove flow to clear this per_cpu() after arch_unregister_cpu() has completed, allowing it to be used in there as well. Note that on x86 for the CPU hotplug case, the pr->id prior to acpi_map_cpu() may be invalid. Thus the per_cpu() structures must be initialized after that call or after checking the ID is valid (not hotplug path). Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron --- v8: On buggy bios detection when setting per_cpu structures do not carry on. Fix up the clearing of per cpu structures to remove unwanted side effects and ensure an error code isn't use to reference them. --- drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c | 79 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------- 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c index ba0a6f0ac841..3b180e21f325 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c @@ -183,8 +183,38 @@ static void __init acpi_pcc_cpufreq_init(void) {} #endif /* CONFIG_X86 */ /* Initialization */ +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(void *, processor_device_array); + +static bool acpi_processor_set_per_cpu(struct acpi_processor *pr, + struct acpi_device *device) +{ + BUG_ON(pr->id >= nr_cpu_ids); + /* + * Buggy BIOS check. + * ACPI id of processors can be reported wrongly by the BIOS. + * Don't trust it blindly + */ + if (per_cpu(processor_device_array, pr->id) != NULL && + per_cpu(processor_device_array, pr->id) != device) { + dev_warn(&device->dev, + "BIOS reported wrong ACPI id %d for the processor\n", + pr->id); + /* Give up, but do not abort the namespace scan. */ + return false; + } + /* + * processor_device_array is not cleared on errors to allow buggy BIOS + * checks. + */ + per_cpu(processor_device_array, pr->id) = device; + per_cpu(processors, pr->id) = pr; + + return true; +} + #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_CPU -static int acpi_processor_hotadd_init(struct acpi_processor *pr) +static int acpi_processor_hotadd_init(struct acpi_processor *pr, + struct acpi_device *device) { int ret; @@ -198,8 +228,15 @@ static int acpi_processor_hotadd_init(struct acpi_processor *pr) if (ret) goto out; + if (!acpi_processor_set_per_cpu(pr, device)) { + acpi_unmap_cpu(pr->id); + goto out; + } + ret = arch_register_cpu(pr->id); if (ret) { + /* Leave the processor device array in place to detect buggy bios */ + per_cpu(processors, pr->id) = NULL; acpi_unmap_cpu(pr->id); goto out; } @@ -217,7 +254,8 @@ static int acpi_processor_hotadd_init(struct acpi_processor *pr) return ret; } #else -static inline int acpi_processor_hotadd_init(struct acpi_processor *pr) +static inline int acpi_processor_hotadd_init(struct acpi_processor *pr, + struct acpi_device *device) { return -ENODEV; } @@ -316,10 +354,13 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_info(struct acpi_device *device) * because cpuid <-> apicid mapping is persistent now. */ if (invalid_logical_cpuid(pr->id) || !cpu_present(pr->id)) { - int ret = acpi_processor_hotadd_init(pr); + int ret = acpi_processor_hotadd_init(pr, device); if (ret) return ret; + } else { + if (!acpi_processor_set_per_cpu(pr, device)) + return 0; } /* @@ -365,8 +406,6 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_info(struct acpi_device *device) * (cpu_data(cpu)) values, like CPU feature flags, family, model, etc. * Such things have to be put in and set up by the processor driver's .probe(). */ -static DEFINE_PER_CPU(void *, processor_device_array); - static int acpi_processor_add(struct acpi_device *device, const struct acpi_device_id *id) { @@ -395,28 +434,6 @@ static int acpi_processor_add(struct acpi_device *device, if (result) /* Processor is not physically present or unavailable */ return 0; - BUG_ON(pr->id >= nr_cpu_ids); - - /* - * Buggy BIOS check. - * ACPI id of processors can be reported wrongly by the BIOS. - * Don't trust it blindly - */ - if (per_cpu(processor_device_array, pr->id) != NULL && - per_cpu(processor_device_array, pr->id) != device) { - dev_warn(&device->dev, - "BIOS reported wrong ACPI id %d for the processor\n", - pr->id); - /* Give up, but do not abort the namespace scan. */ - goto err; - } - /* - * processor_device_array is not cleared on errors to allow buggy BIOS - * checks. - */ - per_cpu(processor_device_array, pr->id) = device; - per_cpu(processors, pr->id) = pr; - dev = get_cpu_device(pr->id); if (!dev) { result = -ENODEV; @@ -469,10 +486,6 @@ static void acpi_processor_remove(struct acpi_device *device) device_release_driver(pr->dev); acpi_unbind_one(pr->dev); - /* Clean up. */ - per_cpu(processor_device_array, pr->id) = NULL; - per_cpu(processors, pr->id) = NULL; - cpu_maps_update_begin(); cpus_write_lock(); @@ -480,6 +493,10 @@ static void acpi_processor_remove(struct acpi_device *device) arch_unregister_cpu(pr->id); acpi_unmap_cpu(pr->id); + /* Clean up. */ + per_cpu(processor_device_array, pr->id) = NULL; + per_cpu(processors, pr->id) = NULL; + cpus_write_unlock(); cpu_maps_update_done(); -- 2.39.2