Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-160426-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.80.249 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.80.249;
From: Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 18:56:42 +0200
Subject: [PATCH v2 09/12] ASoC: doc: dapm: fix and improve section
 "Registering DAPM controls"
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <20240426-dapm-docs-v2-9-87b07547eb5b@bootlin.com>
References: <20240426-dapm-docs-v2-0-87b07547eb5b@bootlin.com>
In-Reply-To: <20240426-dapm-docs-v2-0-87b07547eb5b@bootlin.com>
To: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, 
 Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>, 
 Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>, 
 Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>, 
 Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>, 
 linux-sound@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, 
 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com>

Extend the first paragraph to mention the {,num_}dapm_routes fields just
like the widget conterparts. Mention the route fields also in the code
example. Fix "at build time", this really means "at probe time".

Reviewed-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com>
---
 Documentation/sound/soc/dapm.rst | 21 ++++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/sound/soc/dapm.rst b/Documentation/sound/soc/dapm.rst
index 4b094c3d7942..2831b00ae4e2 100644
--- a/Documentation/sound/soc/dapm.rst
+++ b/Documentation/sound/soc/dapm.rst
@@ -254,12 +254,17 @@ This can be used to merge two signal paths together in software.
 Registering DAPM controls
 =========================
 
-In many cases the DAPM widgets implemented statically in a ``static const
-struct snd_soc_dapm_widget`` array and the routes connecting them in a
-``static const struct snd_soc_dapm_route`` array in a codec driver, and
-simply declared via the ``dapm_widgets`` and ``num_dapm_widgets`` fields of
-the ``struct snd_soc_component_driver`` so the driver registration will
-take care of populating them::
+In many cases the DAPM widgets are implemented statically in a ``static
+const struct snd_soc_dapm_widget`` array in a codec driver, and simply
+declared via the ``dapm_widgets`` and ``num_dapm_widgets`` fields of the
+``struct snd_soc_component_driver``.
+
+Similarly, routes connecting them are implemented statically in a ``static
+const struct snd_soc_dapm_route`` array and declared via the
+``dapm_routes`` and ``num_dapm_routes`` fields of the same struct.
+
+With the above declared, the driver registration will take care of
+populating them::
 
   static const struct snd_soc_dapm_widget wm2000_dapm_widgets[] = {
   	SND_SOC_DAPM_OUTPUT("SPKN"),
@@ -278,11 +283,13 @@ take care of populating them::
 	...
   	.dapm_widgets		= wm2000_dapm_widgets,
   	.num_dapm_widgets	= ARRAY_SIZE(wm2000_dapm_widgets),
+  	.dapm_routes            = wm2000_audio_map,
+  	.num_dapm_routes        = ARRAY_SIZE(wm2000_audio_map),
 	...
   };
 
 In more complex cases the list of DAPM widgets and/or routes can be only
-known at build time. This happens for example when a driver supports
+known at probe time. This happens for example when a driver supports
 different models having a different set of features. In those cases
 separate widgets and routes arrays implementing the case-specific features
 can be registered programmatically by calling snd_soc_dapm_new_controls()

-- 
2.34.1