Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-160480-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.80.249 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.80.249;
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Z qiang <qiang.zhang1211@gmail.com>, paulmck@kernel.org
Cc: syzbot <syzbot+dce04ed6d1438ad69656@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>,
 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
 syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [syzbot] [kernel?] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage in __do_softirq
In-Reply-To: <CALm+0cVvM56xse8ejf7+Wro+XBkFwY-MO1jyhWcVU8BWaZ2qjg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALm+0cWx1kYtftE4nj7Jjgx2_bmNmSrBAgd36ksSvxJtNVhxHg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CALm+0cWRC1kqLJvmEqda4O97PZ-n0R0UQ35=fi6oA3rLsPoUSQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <8f281a10-b85a-4586-9586-5bbc12dc784f@paulmck-laptop>
 <CALm+0cWN0+cCsYddBUefya3aUw9c9Xn89GVV=Ys1_UPjS19WrQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <4c09abb6-4f6e-42d7-9944-c5da995649cb@paulmck-laptop>
 <CALm+0cVaLfE2ieK9aqh9yHkPDyO7zWbMe9K6WjTUgm4t9SnSFQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <ac7bf2c3-c752-46db-a5c8-0c55a1af8561@paulmck-laptop>
 <CALm+0cXGBPWxiNOkAoQG4hdnKCeVVR-APbfBPk9OGeU2RW+bKA@mail.gmail.com>
 <87o7a1umj3.ffs@tglx>
 <CALm+0cUesD9KaWyfsRUyGdErbrU11sAfRgRR=Qjyz7Boq9Vt=g@mail.gmail.com>
 <b735d174-8ad9-4ace-86ee-75dc09852537@paulmck-laptop>
 <CALm+0cVvM56xse8ejf7+Wro+XBkFwY-MO1jyhWcVU8BWaZ2qjg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 19:23:04 +0200
Message-ID: <8734r8t4w7.ffs@tglx>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain

On Fri, Apr 26 2024 at 10:09, Z qiang wrote:
>> This looks quite nice to me, especially given that it avoids changing
>> all the other calls to __do_softirq().  Some architectures might want
>> to directly call handle_softirqs(), but if so, they can send the patches.
>
>
> Can you send an official patch? or I will send and add you to
> Co-developed-by tags.

Just send it along with a nice changelog and add:

Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

That's good enough.