Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-160257-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:4601:e00::3 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:4601:e00::3;
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 18:11:56 +0300
From: Tony Lindgren <tony.lindgren@linux.intel.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Claudiu <claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev>, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
	jirislaby@kernel.org, tony@atomide.com, l.sanfilippo@kunbus.com,
	tglx@linutronix.de, geert+renesas@glider.be, ulf.hansson@linaro.org,
	peng.fan@nxp.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@bp.renesas.com>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: [RFT PATCH v2] serial: core: Call device_set_awake_path() for
 console port
Message-ID: <ZivDpyUgTinFbQh4@black.fi.intel.com>
References: <20240425070936.547100-1-claudiu.beznea.uj@bp.renesas.com>
 <ZionWJ7ods60zuYX@smile.fi.intel.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <ZionWJ7ods60zuYX@smile.fi.intel.com>

On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 12:50:16PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> The rest makes sense to me as we also have an internal hack to achieve
> something similar in the case of Intel LPSS (8250_dw).
> 
> But I like Tony to comment on this, from my perspective it's good:
> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>

Yes nice, makes sense to me too:

Reviewed-by: Tony Lindgren <tony.lindgren@linux.intel.com>