Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754108AbYA1HB7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jan 2008 02:01:59 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751344AbYA1HBs (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jan 2008 02:01:48 -0500 Received: from e33.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.151]:43543 "EHLO e33.co.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750802AbYA1HBr (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jan 2008 02:01:47 -0500 Message-ID: <479D7DEB.7070806@austin.ibm.com> Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 01:02:03 -0600 From: Joel Schopp User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dmitri Vorobiev CC: Tigran Aivazian , trivial@kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, apw@shadowen.org, rdunlap@xenotime.net, Linux-kernel Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 8/9] bfs: remove multiple assignments References: <1201296027-6900-1-git-send-email-dmitri.vorobiev@gmail.com> <1201296027-6900-9-git-send-email-dmitri.vorobiev@gmail.com> <479BC6E5.5000409@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <479BC6E5.5000409@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1309 Lines: 30 >>> - inode->i_mtime = inode->i_atime = inode->i_ctime = CURRENT_TIME_SEC; >>> + inode->i_mtime = CURRENT_TIME_SEC; >>> + inode->i_atime = CURRENT_TIME_SEC; >>> + inode->i_ctime = CURRENT_TIME_SEC; >> multiple assignments like "x = y = z = value;" can potentially >> (depending on the compiler and arch) be faster than "x = value; y = >> value; z=value;" >> >> I am surprized that this script complains about them as it is a >> perfectly valid thing to do in C. > > I think it seems wise to ask the maintainers of checkpatch.pl to > comment on that. I'm Cc:ing them now. > There are plenty of things that are valid to do in C that don't make for maintainable code. These scripts are designed to make your code easier for real people to review and maintain. As for if this can be faster we don't deal in the realm of "can". Please show a concrete example of gcc making Linux kernel code faster with multiple assignments per line. If you can do that I'm willing to change my mind and I'll lead the charge for mutliple assignments per line. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/