Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-161583-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45e3:2400::1;
Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2024 14:55:36 -0700 (PDT)
Subject:     Re: linux-next: duplicate patch in the risc-v tree
In-Reply-To: <20240429073553.503958e8@canb.auug.org.au>
CC: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
  linux-next@vger.kernel.org
From: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Message-ID: <mhng-24fa846c-974e-452c-a593-2206e8970851@palmer-ri-x1c9>
Precedence: bulk
Mime-Version: 1.0 (MHng)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

On Sun, 28 Apr 2024 14:35:53 PDT (-0700), Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The following commits are also in Linus Torvalds' tree as different
> commits (but the same patch):
>
>   bac292e849d7 ("selftests: sud_test: return correct emulated syscall value on RISC-V")
>
> This is commit
>
>   17c67ed752d6 ("selftests: sud_test: return correct emulated syscall value on RISC-V")
>
> in Linus' tree.

Sorry about that, looks like I accidentally merge this into both 
for-next and fixes.  It's a fix, though not strictly a regression (the 
selftest never worked), so maybe I just was being too careful the first 
time.

I dropped it from for-next.

>
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell