Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 4 Jan 2002 19:31:35 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 4 Jan 2002 19:31:25 -0500 Received: from mailf.telia.com ([194.22.194.25]:17662 "EHLO mailf.telia.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 4 Jan 2002 19:31:21 -0500 Message-Id: <200201050031.g050V7217956@mailf.telia.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Roger Larsson To: , Dieter =?iso-8859-1?q?N=FCtzel?= Subject: Re: [announce] [patch] ultra-scalable O(1) SMP and UP scheduler Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2002 01:28:27 +0100 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2] Cc: Linux Kernel List In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fridayen den 4 January 2002 12.42, Ingo Molnar wrote: > On Fri, 4 Jan 2002, Dieter [iso-8859-15] N?tzel wrote: > > What next? Maybe a combination of O(1) and preempt? > > yes, fast preemption of kernel-mode tasks and the scheduler code are > almost orthogonal. So i agree that to get the best interactive performance > we need both. > > Ingo > > ps. i'm working on fixing the crashes you saw. > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ Ingo, The preemtion kernel adds protection to per process data... And it is not (yet) updated to handle the O(1) scheduler! /RogerL -- Roger Larsson Skellefte? Sweden - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/