Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-161735-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.48.161 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.48.161;
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 10:19:16 +0530
From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
To: Linux regressions mailing list <regressions@lists.linux.dev>
Cc: dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	parthiban@linumiz.com, saravanan@linumiz.com,
	'karthikeyan' <karthikeyan@linumiz.com>,
	"bumyong.lee" <bumyong.lee@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: dmaengine: CPU stalls while loading bluetooth module
Message-ID: <Zi8mzMWubkfi9UiV@matsya>
References: <000001da6ecc$adb25420$0916fc60$@samsung.com>
 <12de921e-ae42-4eb3-a61a-dadc6cd640b8@leemhuis.info>
 <000001da7140$6a0f1570$3e2d4050$@samsung.com>
 <07b0c5f6-1fe2-474e-a312-5eb85a14a5c8@leemhuis.info>
 <001001da7a60$78603130$69209390$@samsung.com>
 <9490757c-4d7c-4d8b-97e2-812a237f902b@leemhuis.info>
 <8734a80b-c7a9-4cc2-91c9-123b391d468c@leemhuis.info>
 <ZgUTbiL86_bg0ZkZ@matsya>
 <2b2a6c9f-4df2-4962-b926-09adccd20715@leemhuis.info>
 <0b5da67a-7482-4f18-9246-9c118f182b8b@leemhuis.info>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <0b5da67a-7482-4f18-9246-9c118f182b8b@leemhuis.info>

On 25-04-24, 12:03, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> On 28.03.24 16:06, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote:
> > On 28.03.24 07:51, Vinod Koul wrote:
> >> On 26-03-24, 14:50, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Vinod Koul, what's your option here? We have two reports about
> >>> regressions caused by 22a9d958581244 ("dmaengine: pl330: issue_pending
> >>> waits until WFP state") [v6.8-rc1] now:
> >>>
> >>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1553a526-6f28-4a68-88a8-f35bd22d9894@linumiz.com/
> >>>
> >>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZYhQ2-OnjDgoqjvt@wens.tw/
> >>> [the first link points to the start of this thread]
> >>>
> >>> To me it sounds like this is a change that better should be reverted,
> >>> but you are of course the better judge here.
> >>
> >> Sure I have reverted this,
> >
> > Thx!
> 
> That revert afaics has not made it to Linus yet. Is that intentional, or
> did it just fell through the cracks?

Nope, it was sent to Linus last week and is now in -rc6...

-- 
~Vinod