Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/2] xtime_lock vs update_process_times
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: rth@twiddle.net, bryan.wu@analog.com, dhowells@redhat.com,
       gerg@uclinux.org, lethal@linux-sh.org, wli@holomorphy.com,
       davem@davemloft.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
       linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@elte.hu,
       torvalds@linux-foundation.org
In-Reply-To: <20080128122030.GA14058@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
References: <20080128103953.326762000@chello.nl>
	 <20080128104056.184943000@chello.nl>
	 <20080128122030.GA14058@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 13:29:33 +0100
Message-Id: <1201523373.28547.3.camel@lappy>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 881
Lines: 26


On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 12:20 +0000, Russell King wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 11:39:55AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > move update_process_times() out from under xtime_lock.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
> 
> Peter,
> 
> Mind if I merge:
> 
> >  arch/arm/common/time-acorn.c          |    2 --
> >  arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam926x_time.c |    3 ---
> >  arch/arm/plat-iop/time.c              |    4 ----
> >  arch/arm/plat-s3c24xx/time.c          |    2 --
> 
> with my patch and submit it as part of the ARM merge (which I'm hoping
> to send in about an hours time.)

not at all, please do :-)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/