Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 4 Jan 2002 19:56:05 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 4 Jan 2002 19:55:56 -0500 Received: from harpo.it.uu.se ([130.238.12.34]:11193 "EHLO harpo.it.uu.se") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 4 Jan 2002 19:55:42 -0500 Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2002 01:51:41 +0100 (MET) From: Mikael Pettersson Message-Id: <200201050051.BAA16036@harpo.it.uu.se> To: axboe@suse.de, torvalds@transmeta.com Subject: 2.5.2-pre performance degradation on an old 486 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org When running 2.5.2-pre7 on my old for-testing-only 486(*), file-system accesses seem to come in distinct bursts preceded by lengthy pauses. Overall performance is down quite significantly compared to 2.4.18pre1 and 2.2.20pre2. To measure it I ran two simple tests: Test 1: time to boot the kernel, from hitting enter at the LILO prompt to getting a login prompt Test 2: time to "rm -rf" a clean linux-2.4.17 source tree, using the newly booted kernel (no other access to the tree before that, so it wasn't cached in any way, and the machine was otherwise idle) Test 1 Test 2 2.2.21pre2: 71 sec 75 sec 2.4.18pre1: 64 sec 72 sec 2.5.2-pre7: 97 sec 251 sec I haven't noticed any slowdowns on my other boxes, so I didn't do any measurements on them. On the 486 it's very very obvious. /Mikael (*) 100MHz 486DX4, 28MB ram, no L2 cache, two old and slow IDE disks, small custom no-nonsense RedHat 7.2, kernels compiled with gcc 2.95.3. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/