Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-162845-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.199.223 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.199.223;
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 14:45:48 -0400
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
Cc: virtualization@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	jasowang@redhat.com, shan.gavin@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] vhost: Drop variable last_avail_idx in
 vhost_get_vq_desc()
Message-ID: <20240429144522-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
References: <20240429101400.617007-1-gshan@redhat.com>
 <20240429101400.617007-3-gshan@redhat.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20240429101400.617007-3-gshan@redhat.com>

On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 08:13:58PM +1000, Gavin Shan wrote:
> The local variable @last_avail_idx is equivalent to vq->last_avail_idx.
> So the code can be simplified a bit by dropping the local variable
> @last_avail_idx.
> 
> No functional change intended.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
> ---
>  drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 7 +++----
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> index 7aa623117aab..b278c0333a66 100644
> --- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> +++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> @@ -2524,7 +2524,6 @@ int vhost_get_vq_desc(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
>  {
>  	struct vring_desc desc;
>  	unsigned int i, head, found = 0;
> -	u16 last_avail_idx = vq->last_avail_idx;
>  	__virtio16 ring_head;
>  	int ret, access;
>  
> @@ -2539,10 +2538,10 @@ int vhost_get_vq_desc(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
>  
>  	/* Grab the next descriptor number they're advertising, and increment
>  	 * the index we've seen. */
> -	if (unlikely(vhost_get_avail_head(vq, &ring_head, last_avail_idx))) {
> +	if (unlikely(vhost_get_avail_head(vq, &ring_head, vq->last_avail_idx))) {
>  		vq_err(vq, "Failed to read head: idx %d address %p\n",
> -		       last_avail_idx,
> -		       &vq->avail->ring[last_avail_idx % vq->num]);
> +		       vq->last_avail_idx,
> +		       &vq->avail->ring[vq->last_avail_idx % vq->num]);
>  		return -EFAULT;
>  	}

I don't see the big advantage and the line is long now.

>  
> -- 
> 2.44.0