Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-162863-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.80.249 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.80.249;
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 11:56:43 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>, Alexei Starovoitov
 <ast@kernel.org>, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>, David Miller
 <davem@davemloft.net>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, bpf
 <bpf@vger.kernel.org>, Networking <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, Linux Kernel
 Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Linux Next Mailing List
 <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>, Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>,
 Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com>, Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the bpf-next tree with the net tree
Message-ID: <20240429115643.7df77e08@kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20240429114939.210328b0@canb.auug.org.au>
References: <20240429114939.210328b0@canb.auug.org.au>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Mon, 29 Apr 2024 11:49:39 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>  +u64 __weak bpf_arch_uaddress_limit(void)
>  +{
>  +#if defined(CONFIG_64BIT) && defined(CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_NON_OVERLAPPING_ADDRESS_SPACE)
>  +	return TASK_SIZE;
>  +#else
>  +	return 0;
>  +#endif
>  +}
>  +
> + bool __weak bpf_jit_supports_insn(struct bpf_insn *insn, bool in_arena)
> + {
> + 	return false;
> + }

Thanks! FTR I plan to used the inverse order, if that matters..