Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754501AbYA1Sdv (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jan 2008 13:33:51 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752628AbYA1Sdl (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jan 2008 13:33:41 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:34482 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752422AbYA1Sdk (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jan 2008 13:33:40 -0500 Message-ID: <479E1FA6.1030708@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 13:32:06 -0500 From: Tony Camuso Reply-To: tcamuso@redhat.com User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Grant Grundler CC: Matthew Wilcox , Greg KH , Loic Prylli , Adrian Bunk , Linus Torvalds , Arjan van de Ven , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Ivan Kokshaysky , Greg KH , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jeff Garzik , linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, Martin Mares Subject: Re: [Patch v2] Make PCI extended config space (MMCONFIG) a driver opt-in References: <20080112002638.GA18710@kroah.com> <20080112144030.GA19279@jurassic.park.msu.ru> <1200208085.6896.134.camel@pasglop> <20080113072415.GB18741@parisc-linux.org> <20080113090108.3224698c@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <20080114225225.GQ18741@parisc-linux.org> <20080114230448.GL9847@does.not.exist> <478CD8A5.5090608@myri.com> <20080115174643.GB28238@kroah.com> <20080115175641.GE18741@parisc-linux.org> <20080119165809.GB11553@colo.lackof.org> In-Reply-To: <20080119165809.GB11553@colo.lackof.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1168 Lines: 30 Greg, Have you given Grant's suggestion any further consideration? I'd like to know how the MMCONFIG issues discussed in this thread are going to be handled upstream. I have a patch implemented in RHEL 5.2, but I would rather have the upstream patch implemented, whatever it is. Grant Grundler wrote: > On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 10:56:41AM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 09:46:43AM -0800, Greg KH wrote: >>> But so far, we have a zillion patches floating around, claiming >>> different things, some with signed-off-bys and others without, so for >>> now, I'll just stick with Arjan's patch in -mm and see if anyone >>> complains about those releases... >> I complain about Arjan's patch. For reasons which have been adequately >> gone into already in this thread. > > Agreed. > Greg, I think at least two better alternatives were proposed already. > Please review the thread again. > > grant -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/