Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-163329-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 139.178.88.99 as permitted sender) client-ip=139.178.88.99;
Received-SPF: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of nvidia.com designates
 216.228.118.233 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com;
 client-ip=216.228.118.233; helo=mail.nvidia.com; pr=C
From: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
To: <will@kernel.org>, <robin.murphy@arm.com>
CC: <joro@8bytes.org>, <jgg@nvidia.com>, <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	<vdumpa@nvidia.com>, <jonathanh@nvidia.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<iommu@lists.linux.dev>, <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v6 1/6] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Pass in cmdq pointer to arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmdlist()
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 21:43:44 -0700
Message-ID: <0acb55059f7212abdf4277a81e2f033127072bc9.1714451595.git.nicolinc@nvidia.com>
In-Reply-To: <cover.1714451595.git.nicolinc@nvidia.com>
References: <cover.1714451595.git.nicolinc@nvidia.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Apr 2024 04:44:09.9360
 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 8a0dd7fb-52a8-4faf-9a79-08dc68d02d33
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 43083d15-7273-40c1-b7db-39efd9ccc17a
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalAttributedTenantConnectingIp: TenantId=43083d15-7273-40c1-b7db-39efd9ccc17a;Ip=[216.228.118.233];Helo=[mail.nvidia.com]
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource:
	SA2PEPF0000150A.namprd04.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Anonymous
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: HybridOnPrem
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BY5PR12MB4276

The driver currently calls arm_smmu_get_cmdq() helper in different places,
although they are all called from the arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmdlist().

Allow to pass in the cmdq pointer, instead of calling arm_smmu_get_cmdq()
every time.

This will also help CMDQV extension in NVIDIA Tegra241 SoC, as its driver
will maintain its own cmdq pointers, then need to redirect arm_smmu->cmdq
to one of its vcmdqs upon seeing a supported command.

Signed-off-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
---
 drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c | 15 ++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
index 41f93c3ab160..6a7e6b1ba5f7 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
@@ -596,11 +596,11 @@ static void arm_smmu_cmdq_poll_valid_map(struct arm_smmu_cmdq *cmdq,
 
 /* Wait for the command queue to become non-full */
 static int arm_smmu_cmdq_poll_until_not_full(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
+					     struct arm_smmu_cmdq *cmdq,
 					     struct arm_smmu_ll_queue *llq)
 {
 	unsigned long flags;
 	struct arm_smmu_queue_poll qp;
-	struct arm_smmu_cmdq *cmdq = arm_smmu_get_cmdq(smmu);
 	int ret = 0;
 
 	/*
@@ -631,11 +631,11 @@ static int arm_smmu_cmdq_poll_until_not_full(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
  * Must be called with the cmdq lock held in some capacity.
  */
 static int __arm_smmu_cmdq_poll_until_msi(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
+					  struct arm_smmu_cmdq *cmdq,
 					  struct arm_smmu_ll_queue *llq)
 {
 	int ret = 0;
 	struct arm_smmu_queue_poll qp;
-	struct arm_smmu_cmdq *cmdq = arm_smmu_get_cmdq(smmu);
 	u32 *cmd = (u32 *)(Q_ENT(&cmdq->q, llq->prod));
 
 	queue_poll_init(smmu, &qp);
@@ -655,10 +655,10 @@ static int __arm_smmu_cmdq_poll_until_msi(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
  * Must be called with the cmdq lock held in some capacity.
  */
 static int __arm_smmu_cmdq_poll_until_consumed(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
+					       struct arm_smmu_cmdq *cmdq,
 					       struct arm_smmu_ll_queue *llq)
 {
 	struct arm_smmu_queue_poll qp;
-	struct arm_smmu_cmdq *cmdq = arm_smmu_get_cmdq(smmu);
 	u32 prod = llq->prod;
 	int ret = 0;
 
@@ -705,12 +705,13 @@ static int __arm_smmu_cmdq_poll_until_consumed(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
 }
 
 static int arm_smmu_cmdq_poll_until_sync(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
+					 struct arm_smmu_cmdq *cmdq,
 					 struct arm_smmu_ll_queue *llq)
 {
 	if (smmu->options & ARM_SMMU_OPT_MSIPOLL)
-		return __arm_smmu_cmdq_poll_until_msi(smmu, llq);
+		return __arm_smmu_cmdq_poll_until_msi(smmu, cmdq, llq);
 
-	return __arm_smmu_cmdq_poll_until_consumed(smmu, llq);
+	return __arm_smmu_cmdq_poll_until_consumed(smmu, cmdq, llq);
 }
 
 static void arm_smmu_cmdq_write_entries(struct arm_smmu_cmdq *cmdq, u64 *cmds,
@@ -767,7 +768,7 @@ static int arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmdlist(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
 
 		while (!queue_has_space(&llq, n + sync)) {
 			local_irq_restore(flags);
-			if (arm_smmu_cmdq_poll_until_not_full(smmu, &llq))
+			if (arm_smmu_cmdq_poll_until_not_full(smmu, cmdq, &llq))
 				dev_err_ratelimited(smmu->dev, "CMDQ timeout\n");
 			local_irq_save(flags);
 		}
@@ -843,7 +844,7 @@ static int arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmdlist(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
 	/* 5. If we are inserting a CMD_SYNC, we must wait for it to complete */
 	if (sync) {
 		llq.prod = queue_inc_prod_n(&llq, n);
-		ret = arm_smmu_cmdq_poll_until_sync(smmu, &llq);
+		ret = arm_smmu_cmdq_poll_until_sync(smmu, cmdq, &llq);
 		if (ret) {
 			dev_err_ratelimited(smmu->dev,
 					    "CMD_SYNC timeout at 0x%08x [hwprod 0x%08x, hwcons 0x%08x]\n",
-- 
2.43.0