Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-163616-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.80.249 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.80.249;
Message-ID: <a987385c-d241-4527-acd5-31767c62317f@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 10:03:38 +0100
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] slimbus: patches for v6.10
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <20240430085007.33607-1-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
 <2024043013-foil-pucker-4c7b@gregkh>
Content-Language: en-US
From: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
In-Reply-To: <2024043013-foil-pucker-4c7b@gregkh>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


On 30/04/2024 09:56, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 09:50:03AM +0100, srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org wrote:
>> From: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
>>
>> Here are few patches in slimbus for 6.10 that includes
>> - fixing autoloading.
>> - coverting driver remove to return void
>> - some timeout fixes on wait operation.
>>
>> Please note that, I have also included a fix at the start of this series
>> rather than sending another email thread. I hope that is okay with you.
>>
>> Can you please queue them up for 6.10
> 
> Shouldn't the first commit go to 6.9?  If so, why include it here?

Yes, first commit should go to 6.9, Do you want me to resend the series 
without that patch or are you okay to pick it this time?

I sent the fix with this series because it was just one patch, and we 
are almost near to rc7.


thanks for your help.

-srini
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h