Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-163620-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1;
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 11:09:49 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] slimbus: patches for v6.10
Message-ID: <2024043006-palpable-tipoff-1ce2@gregkh>
References: <20240430085007.33607-1-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
 <2024043013-foil-pucker-4c7b@gregkh>
 <a987385c-d241-4527-acd5-31767c62317f@linaro.org>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <a987385c-d241-4527-acd5-31767c62317f@linaro.org>

On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 10:03:38AM +0100, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
> 
> 
> On 30/04/2024 09:56, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 09:50:03AM +0100, srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org wrote:
> > > From: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
> > > 
> > > Here are few patches in slimbus for 6.10 that includes
> > > - fixing autoloading.
> > > - coverting driver remove to return void
> > > - some timeout fixes on wait operation.
> > > 
> > > Please note that, I have also included a fix at the start of this series
> > > rather than sending another email thread. I hope that is okay with you.
> > > 
> > > Can you please queue them up for 6.10
> > 
> > Shouldn't the first commit go to 6.9?  If so, why include it here?
> 
> Yes, first commit should go to 6.9, Do you want me to resend the series
> without that patch or are you okay to pick it this time?

Please do so, send 2 series, one with one patch and one with the rest.
Remember, tools like 'b4' want to take the whole series at once.

> I sent the fix with this series because it was just one patch, and we are
> almost near to rc7.

It's ok, I have other fixes to send for -final.

thanks,

greg k-h