Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-163740-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1;
Message-ID: <27f4f3dd-9375-40cf-8c8f-1c4edf66e31b@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 12:05:29 +0200
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 6/6] arm64: dts: qcom: ipq9574: Add icc provider
 ability to gcc
To: Varadarajan Narayanan <quic_varada@quicinc.com>
Cc: andersson@kernel.org, mturquette@baylibre.com, sboyd@kernel.org,
 robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, djakov@kernel.org,
 dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org, quic_anusha@quicinc.com,
 linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
 devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
 linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
References: <20240418092305.2337429-1-quic_varada@quicinc.com>
 <20240418092305.2337429-7-quic_varada@quicinc.com>
 <a7194edd-a2c8-46fc-bea1-f26b0960e535@linaro.org>
 <Ziov6bWBXYXJ4Zp8@hu-varada-blr.qualcomm.com>
Content-Language: en-US
From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
Autocrypt: addr=konrad.dybcio@linaro.org; keydata=
 xsFNBF9ALYUBEADWAhxdTBWrwAgDQQzc1O/bJ5O7b6cXYxwbBd9xKP7MICh5YA0DcCjJSOum
 BB/OmIWU6X+LZW6P88ZmHe+KeyABLMP5s1tJNK1j4ntT7mECcWZDzafPWF4F6m4WJOG27kTJ
 HGWdmtO+RvadOVi6CoUDqALsmfS3MUG5Pj2Ne9+0jRg4hEnB92AyF9rW2G3qisFcwPgvatt7
 TXD5E38mLyOPOUyXNj9XpDbt1hNwKQfiidmPh5e7VNAWRnW1iCMMoKqzM1Anzq7e5Afyeifz
 zRcQPLaqrPjnKqZGL2BKQSZDh6NkI5ZLRhhHQf61fkWcUpTp1oDC6jWVfT7hwRVIQLrrNj9G
 MpPzrlN4YuAqKeIer1FMt8cq64ifgTzxHzXsMcUdclzq2LTk2RXaPl6Jg/IXWqUClJHbamSk
 t1bfif3SnmhA6TiNvEpDKPiT3IDs42THU6ygslrBxyROQPWLI9IL1y8S6RtEh8H+NZQWZNzm
 UQ3imZirlPjxZtvz1BtnnBWS06e7x/UEAguj7VHCuymVgpl2Za17d1jj81YN5Rp5L9GXxkV1
 aUEwONM3eCI3qcYm5JNc5X+JthZOWsbIPSC1Rhxz3JmWIwP1udr5E3oNRe9u2LIEq+wH/toH
 kpPDhTeMkvt4KfE5m5ercid9+ZXAqoaYLUL4HCEw+HW0DXcKDwARAQABzShLb25yYWQgRHli
 Y2lvIDxrb25yYWQuZHliY2lvQGxpbmFyby5vcmc+wsGOBBMBCAA4FiEEU24if9oCL2zdAAQV
 R4cBcg5dfFgFAmQ5bqwCGwMFCwkIBwIGFQoJCAsCBBYCAwECHgECF4AACgkQR4cBcg5dfFjO
 BQ//YQV6fkbqQCceYebGg6TiisWCy8LG77zV7DB0VMIWJv7Km7Sz0QQrHQVzhEr3trNenZrf
 yy+o2tQOF2biICzbLM8oyQPY8B///KJTWI2khoB8IJSJq3kNG68NjPg2vkP6CMltC/X3ohAo
 xL2UgwN5vj74QnlNneOjc0vGbtA7zURNhTz5P/YuTudCqcAbxJkbqZM4WymjQhe0XgwHLkiH
 5LHSZ31MRKp/+4Kqs4DTXMctc7vFhtUdmatAExDKw8oEz5NbskKbW+qHjW1XUcUIrxRr667V
 GWH6MkVceT9ZBrtLoSzMLYaQXvi3sSAup0qiJiBYszc/VOu3RbIpNLRcXN3KYuxdQAptacTE
 mA+5+4Y4DfC3rUSun+hWLDeac9z9jjHm5rE998OqZnOU9aztbd6zQG5VL6EKgsVXAZD4D3RP
 x1NaAjdA3MD06eyvbOWiA5NSzIcC8UIQvgx09xm7dThCuQYJR4Yxjd+9JPJHI6apzNZpDGvQ
 BBZzvwxV6L1CojUEpnilmMG1ZOTstktWpNzw3G2Gis0XihDUef0MWVsQYJAl0wfiv/0By+XK
 mm2zRR+l/dnzxnlbgJ5pO0imC2w0TVxLkAp0eo0LHw619finad2u6UPQAkZ4oj++iIGrJkt5
 Lkn2XgB+IW8ESflz6nDY3b5KQRF8Z6XLP0+IEdLOOARkOW7yEgorBgEEAZdVAQUBAQdAwmUx
 xrbSCx2ksDxz7rFFGX1KmTkdRtcgC6F3NfuNYkYDAQgHwsF2BBgBCAAgFiEEU24if9oCL2zd
 AAQVR4cBcg5dfFgFAmQ5bvICGwwACgkQR4cBcg5dfFju1Q//Xta1ShwL0MLSC1KL1lXGXeRM
 8arzfyiB5wJ9tb9U/nZvhhdfilEDLe0jKJY0RJErbdRHsalwQCrtq/1ewQpMpsRxXzAjgfRN
 jc4tgxRWmI+aVTzSRpywNahzZBT695hMz81cVZJoZzaV0KaMTlSnBkrviPz1nIGHYCHJxF9r
 cIu0GSIyUjZ/7xslxdvjpLth16H27JCWDzDqIQMtg61063gNyEyWgt1qRSaK14JIH/DoYRfn
 jfFQSC8bffFjat7BQGFz4ZpRavkMUFuDirn5Tf28oc5ebe2cIHp4/kajTx/7JOxWZ80U70mA
 cBgEeYSrYYnX+UJsSxpzLc/0sT1eRJDEhI4XIQM4ClIzpsCIN5HnVF76UQXh3a9zpwh3dk8i
 bhN/URmCOTH+LHNJYN/MxY8wuukq877DWB7k86pBs5IDLAXmW8v3gIDWyIcgYqb2v8QO2Mqx
 YMqL7UZxVLul4/JbllsQB8F/fNI8AfttmAQL9cwo6C8yDTXKdho920W4WUR9k8NT/OBqWSyk
 bGqMHex48FVZhexNPYOd58EY9/7mL5u0sJmo+jTeb4JBgIbFPJCFyng4HwbniWgQJZ1WqaUC
 nas9J77uICis2WH7N8Bs9jy0wQYezNzqS+FxoNXmDQg2jetX8en4bO2Di7Pmx0jXA4TOb9TM
 izWDgYvmBE8=
In-Reply-To: <Ziov6bWBXYXJ4Zp8@hu-varada-blr.qualcomm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 25.04.2024 12:26 PM, Varadarajan Narayanan wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 02:58:41PM +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 4/18/24 11:23, Varadarajan Narayanan wrote:
>>> IPQ SoCs dont involve RPM in managing NoC related clocks and
>>> there is no NoC scaling. Linux itself handles these clocks.
>>> However, these should not be exposed as just clocks and align
>>> with other Qualcomm SoCs that handle these clocks from a
>>> interconnect provider.
>>>
>>> Hence include icc provider capability to the gcc node so that
>>> peripherals can use the interconnect facility to enable these
>>> clocks.
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
>>> Signed-off-by: Varadarajan Narayanan <quic_varada@quicinc.com>
>>> ---
>>
>> If this is all you do to enable interconnect (which is not the case,
>> as this patch only satisfies the bindings checker, the meaningful
>> change happens in the previous patch) and nothing explodes, this is
>> an apparent sign of your driver doing nothing.
> 
> It appears to do nothing because, we are just enabling the clock
> provider to also act as interconnect provider. Only when the
> consumers are enabled with interconnect usage, this will create
> paths and turn on the relevant NOC clocks.

No, with sync_state it actually does "something" (sets the interconnect
path bandwidths to zero). And *this* patch does nothing functionally,
it only makes the dt checker happy.

> 
> This interconnect will be used by the PCIe and NSS blocks. When
> those patches were posted earlier, they were put on hold until
> interconnect driver is available.
> 
> Once this patch gets in, PCIe for example will make use of icc.
> Please refer to https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20230519090219.15925-5-quic_devipriy@quicinc.com/.
> 
> The 'pcieX' nodes will include the following entries.
> 
> 	interconnects = <&gcc MASTER_ANOC_PCIE0 &gcc SLAVE_ANOC_PCIE0>,
> 			<&gcc MASTER_SNOC_PCIE0 &gcc SLAVE_SNOC_PCIE0>;
> 	interconnect-names = "pcie-mem", "cpu-pcie";

Okay. What about USB that's already enabled? And BIMC/MEMNOC?

> 
>> The expected reaction to "enabling interconnect" without defining the
>> required paths for your hardware would be a crash-on-sync_state, as all
>> unused (from Linux's POV) resources ought to be shut down.
>>
>> Because you lack sync_state, the interconnects silently retain the state
>> that they were left in (which is not deterministic), and that's precisely
>> what we want to avoid.
> 
> I tried to set 'sync_state' to icc_sync_state to be invoked and
> didn't see any crash.

Have you confirmed that the registers are actually written to, and with
correct values?

Konrad