Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752322AbYA1UrA (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jan 2008 15:47:00 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752365AbYA1Uqw (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jan 2008 15:46:52 -0500 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:39059 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751881AbYA1Uqv (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jan 2008 15:46:51 -0500 Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 12:44:31 -0800 From: Greg KH To: Tony Camuso Cc: Grant Grundler , Matthew Wilcox , Loic Prylli , Adrian Bunk , Linus Torvalds , Arjan van de Ven , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Ivan Kokshaysky , Greg KH , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jeff Garzik , linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, Martin Mares Subject: Re: [Patch v2] Make PCI extended config space (MMCONFIG) a driver opt-in Message-ID: <20080128204431.GA15227@kroah.com> References: <1200208085.6896.134.camel@pasglop> <20080113072415.GB18741@parisc-linux.org> <20080113090108.3224698c@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <20080114225225.GQ18741@parisc-linux.org> <20080114230448.GL9847@does.not.exist> <478CD8A5.5090608@myri.com> <20080115174643.GB28238@kroah.com> <20080115175641.GE18741@parisc-linux.org> <20080119165809.GB11553@colo.lackof.org> <479E1FA6.1030708@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <479E1FA6.1030708@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1069 Lines: 27 On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 01:32:06PM -0500, Tony Camuso wrote: > Greg, > > Have you given Grant's suggestion any further consideration? > > I'd like to know how the MMCONFIG issues discussed in this thread are going > to be handled upstream. I have a patch implemented in RHEL 5.2, but I would > rather have the upstream patch implemented, whatever it is. Well, everyone still doesn't seem to agree on the proper way forward here, so for me to just "pick one" isn't very appropriate. So, can we try again? Can people submit, what they think the change should be? Right now I have Arjan's patch in my kernel tree, but will not send it to Linus for .25 for now, unless everyone thinks that is the best solution at the moment (which, for me, I'm leaning toward right now...) thanks, greg "can't we all just get along?" k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/