Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-164227-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.48.161 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.48.161;
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 16:03:02 +0100
From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
To: Robert Richter <rrichter@amd.com>
CC: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>, Dave Hansen
	<dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>, <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org>, kernel test
 robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 4/7] ACPI/NUMA: Squash
 acpi_numa_memory_affinity_init() into acpi_parse_memory_affinity()
Message-ID: <20240430160302.00005fe1@Huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <20240430092200.2335887-5-rrichter@amd.com>
References: <20240430092200.2335887-1-rrichter@amd.com>
	<20240430092200.2335887-5-rrichter@amd.com>
Organization: Huawei Technologies Research and Development (UK) Ltd.
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Tue, 30 Apr 2024 11:21:57 +0200
Robert Richter <rrichter@amd.com> wrote:

> After removing architectural code the helper function
> acpi_numa_memory_affinity_init() is no longer needed. Squash it into
> acpi_parse_memory_affinity(). No functional changes intended.
> 
> While at it, fixing checkpatch complaints in code moved.
> 
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202403220943.96dde419-oliver.sang@intel.com
> Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Robert Richter <rrichter@amd.com>

Looks good to me. Printing an SRAT entry we then throw away is a bit
odd but it always did that.


Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>