Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-164363-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.80.249 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.80.249;
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 17:23:33 +0100
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Zi Yan <zi.yan@cs.rutgers.edu>,
	"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm64/mm: pmd_mkinvalid() must handle swap pmds
Message-ID: <ZjEbBasQ8H-wa84I@arm.com>
References: <20240430133138.732088-1-ryan.roberts@arm.com>
 <20240430135534.GA14069@willie-the-truck>
 <41a83b7a-17e0-469d-bec4-10ebfff4ef57@arm.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <41a83b7a-17e0-469d-bec4-10ebfff4ef57@arm.com>

On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 03:04:32PM +0100, Ryan Roberts wrote:
> On 30/04/2024 14:55, Will Deacon wrote:
> > But it might be worth splitting the tests from the fix to make backporting
> > easier.
> 
> Yes good point. I'll leave this hanging for today to see if any more comments
> come in, and will re-post tomorrow as 2 patches. I assume we need to go fast to
> catch 6.9.

Yes, I'll pick it up for 6.9. I can drop the tests from the patch (and
their mention in the log) and you can post your tests separately to go
via Andrew's tree.

-- 
Catalin