Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760610AbYA2CKz (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jan 2008 21:10:55 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754571AbYA2CKr (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jan 2008 21:10:47 -0500 Received: from mail.cyberdogtech.com ([64.22.125.39]:42035 "EHLO mail.cyberdogtech.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752412AbYA2CKq (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jan 2008 21:10:46 -0500 Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 20:10:41 -0600 From: Matt LaPlante To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: "Default Linux Capabilities" default in 2.6.24 Message-Id: <20080128201041.e0ac76d5.kernel1@cyberdogtech.com> In-Reply-To: <20080124191201.324cf1a0.kernel1@cyberdogtech.com> References: <20080124191201.324cf1a0.kernel1@cyberdogtech.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.6 (GTK+ 2.10.14; i686-pc-mingw32) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 845 Lines: 28 On Thu, 24 Jan 2008 19:12:01 -0600 Matt LaPlante wrote: > > I'm doing a make oldconfig with the new 2.6.24 kernel. I came to the prompt for "Default Linux Capabilities" which defaults to No: > > --- > Default Linux Capabilities (SECURITY_CAPABILITIES) [N/y/?] (NEW) ? > --- > > However the help text recommends saying Yes. > > --- > This enables the "default" Linux capabilities functionality. > If you are unsure how to answer this question, answer Y. > --- > > Does this seem incongruous? Also, what's the "question"? :) > > Thanks, > Matt LaPlante Anyone? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/