Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-166262-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.48.161 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.48.161;
Date: Thu, 2 May 2024 15:26:26 +0530
From: Sunil V L <sunilvl@ventanamicro.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org,
	acpica-devel@lists.linux.dev,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@sifive.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org>,
	Robert Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>,
	Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>,
	Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	Atish Kumar Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>,
	Andrei Warkentin <andrei.warkentin@intel.com>,
	Haibo1 Xu <haibo1.xu@intel.com>,
	=?utf-8?B?QmrDtnJuIFTDtnBlbA==?= <bjorn@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 01/17] arm64: PCI: Migrate ACPI related functions to
 pci-acpi.c
Message-ID: <ZjNjSpJus7EYT6zn@sunil-laptop>
References: <20240501121742.1215792-1-sunilvl@ventanamicro.com>
 <20240501121742.1215792-2-sunilvl@ventanamicro.com>
 <ZjNbVPYIjINdk4Fn@smile.fi.intel.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <ZjNbVPYIjINdk4Fn@smile.fi.intel.com>

On Thu, May 02, 2024 at 12:22:28PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, May 01, 2024 at 05:47:26PM +0530, Sunil V L wrote:
> > The functions defined in arm64 for ACPI support are required
> > for RISC-V also. To avoid duplication, move these functions
> > to common location.
> 
> ...
> 
> There are -M -C parameters to git format-patch. Use them in the next version of
> the series. (Note, you may add percentage numbers to each of those parameters
> to get prettier result.)
> 
Yeah, I tried different combination of percentage after you told me last
time. I just didn't see any difference in the patch generated. Let me
try again while sending next version. Thanks!