Received: by 2002:ab2:60d1:0:b0:1f7:5705:b850 with SMTP id i17csp1233553lqm; Thu, 2 May 2024 08:44:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=2; AJvYcCVlXabtf4N5WC7f+7SttPMIXFGX/p2SyY3ZFNsR8oi9Gt6Wad16TCPK7IghafBBY9tm9U5p+CZhZxUU7w7LaO2bc9CmXuNrhv70eiaHfQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEU1kh5BfH1Z2FTP4peB4nCJFpNSWjgVb8l8AQa5kpBJYotSSOKKvNirUDip9I/36qFLd/m X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:61c:b0:51f:3fea:cbce with SMTP id b28-20020a056512061c00b0051f3feacbcemr138047lfe.51.1714664653622; Thu, 02 May 2024 08:44:13 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from am.mirrors.kernel.org (am.mirrors.kernel.org. [147.75.80.249]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f7-20020a17090631c700b00a58910383d9si632865ejf.967.2024.05.02.08.44.13 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 02 May 2024 08:44:13 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-166658-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.80.249 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.80.249; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@intel.com header.s=Intel header.b="bP3v/spu"; arc=fail (body hash mismatch); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-166658-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.80.249 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-166658-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by am.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 592161F21F88 for ; Thu, 2 May 2024 15:44:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD8B215AD93; Thu, 2 May 2024 15:44:05 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="bP3v/spu" Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D86C415B14D; Thu, 2 May 2024 15:44:03 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.19 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1714664645; cv=none; b=FLWR2ppvHfZV9bVG1CDdlr9jJIYg5EntQ4pDSo2wAfLcOKyykvRZIdXuPN7SzC6uuDOZ+uWnj3L54xN0f9JTs7wbThWRBghsDNPmDkl9NIbv5tLcdVmU0sI8gQpMVshVeIiLBbMYW9tFdbJ7rqLBhc+d5YCaQbthln6HOFvCLaA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1714664645; c=relaxed/simple; bh=xh4y8j04z59/8X1Tg3qhrjwIBeBWw7wpTCRNn/GaHfU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=JW0YZysDE5UG4J7LxKE1/J+47PqU5KYxzaASMt1GIcNT0ySzk7DhmCcXVA8pDBO4aID8qLCcuNUTHBRbPuyWID4iPViXsTNPuS/py/ksA5dD5Npzt8Xaj47Ukl8T/JJDKR0gNsYCNf0HBGomnSo7q8+isH9GSgoXqq0eJ2aLMH4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=bP3v/spu; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.19 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1714664644; x=1746200644; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=xh4y8j04z59/8X1Tg3qhrjwIBeBWw7wpTCRNn/GaHfU=; b=bP3v/spuhJS4+LBQIl5BIDdl9CRYICPX7MufiGxUmX9A5pHfsWz70dCi T9N/Hp0ozIGDyY3A18uYF04gRVc+L+xtMCdspa/GKxlZbcsLoPLzbOUOZ 3+fw3g+YZ5CS+6sVxVxhljHWJZUvYeB7FYdkuL2dO9HxgTvWau7I5cSba ffiuyvTIeDLcVfj6qbVI3W2oPimfpc9lF1x/btzwyNs3unoXt6UrzdyPL zOKEmBw511nGwJGbosVdOrhc1VOyRyhnNjd4ErA2krATSSfTrBXKirPv9 fghIEDjnRe4vCTDXpcFa3SO351P90uauRzHR6RqLfnQIg8xvqzgCFKbJ6 w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 3sc//M3wRdmD2XsZJpOIdg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: /+4Vzhz0Q1qBn4I9f2zIxg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11062"; a="10296349" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,247,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="10296349" Received: from fmviesa004.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.144]) by orvoesa111.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 02 May 2024 08:44:03 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: /CdbWWBLQFO+s2GkNM8hWw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: /kBsAxPnT222dZF7RJdavw== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,247,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="31767231" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.54]) by fmviesa004.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 02 May 2024 08:44:01 -0700 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.97) (envelope-from ) id 1s2YbH-00000003Mn2-18qx; Thu, 02 May 2024 18:43:59 +0300 Date: Thu, 2 May 2024 18:43:59 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Parker Newman Cc: Parker Newman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman , Jiri Slaby Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 03/13] serial: 8250_exar: Kill CTI_PCI_DEVICE() Message-ID: References: <20240502144626.2716994-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <20240502144626.2716994-4-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <20240502111314.63d66b54@SWDEV2.connecttech.local> <20240502113610.01881f3b@SWDEV2.connecttech.local> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240502113610.01881f3b@SWDEV2.connecttech.local> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo On Thu, May 02, 2024 at 11:36:10AM -0400, Parker Newman wrote: > On Thu, 2 May 2024 18:29:05 +0300 > Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Thu, May 02, 2024 at 11:13:14AM -0400, Parker Newman wrote: .. > > Above I added current code of these macros, can you elaborate how it's incorrect? > > Sorry, you are correct. I was mixed up. No problem. And since you are here, can you tell me what type of EEPROM is connected to the chip in your case? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko