Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758028AbYA2GnS (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Jan 2008 01:43:18 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751785AbYA2GnK (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Jan 2008 01:43:10 -0500 Received: from fgwmail6.fujitsu.co.jp ([192.51.44.36]:53445 "EHLO fgwmail6.fujitsu.co.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751571AbYA2GnJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Jan 2008 01:43:09 -0500 Message-ID: <479ECAC9.5070709@jp.fujitsu.com> Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 15:42:17 +0900 From: INAKOSHI Hiroya User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; ja; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071031 Thunderbird/2.0.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ryo Tsuruta Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com, containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] dm-band: The I/O bandwidth controller: Performance Report References: <20080123.215350.193721890.ryov@valinux.co.jp> <20080125.160720.183032233.ryov@valinux.co.jp> In-Reply-To: <20080125.160720.183032233.ryov@valinux.co.jp> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-2022-JP Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1975 Lines: 61 Hi, Ryo Tsuruta wrote: > The results of bandwidth control test on band-groups. > ===================================================== > The configurations of the test #3: > o Prepare three partitions sdb5 and sdb6. > o Create two extra band-groups on sdb5, the first is of user1 and the > second is of user2. > o Give weights of 40, 20, 10 and 10 to the user1 band-group, the user2 > band-group, the default group of sdb5 and sdb6 respectively. > o Run 128 processes issuing random read/write direct I/O with 4KB data > on each device at the same time. you mean that you run 128 processes on each user-device pairs? Namely, I guess that user1: 128 processes on sdb5, user2: 128 processes on sdb5, another: 128 processes on sdb5, user2: 128 processes on sdb6. > Conclusions and future works > ============================ > Dm-band works well with random I/Os. I have a plan on running some tests > using various real applications such as databases or file servers. > If you have any other good idea to test dm-band, please let me know. The second preliminary studies might be: - What if you use a different I/O size on each device (or device-user pair)? - What if you use a different number of processes on each device (or device-user pair)? And my impression is that it's natural dm-band is in device-mapper, separated from I/O scheduler. Because bandwidth control and I/O scheduling are two different things, it may be simpler that they are implemented in different layers. Regards, Hiroya. > > Thank you, > Ryo Tsuruta. > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/