Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757963AbYA2MNp (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Jan 2008 07:13:45 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752478AbYA2MNg (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Jan 2008 07:13:36 -0500 Received: from metis.extern.pengutronix.de ([83.236.181.26]:44359 "EHLO metis.extern.pengutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751273AbYA2MNf (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Jan 2008 07:13:35 -0500 Message-ID: <479F186A.4020004@pengutronix.de> Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 13:13:30 +0100 From: Luotao Fu User-Agent: Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071009) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Wolfgang Grandegger CC: Luotao Fu , Steven Rostedt , LKML , RT , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc8-rt1: Strange latencies on mpc5200 powerpc - RCU issue? References: <1200544050.318.18.camel@localhost.localdomain> <478F2A46.5070506@grandegger.com> <20080123145340.GE6200@pengutronix.de> <47976D06.1010900@grandegger.com> <479DF0A1.3000906@pengutronix.de> <479DF711.5090406@grandegger.com> In-Reply-To: <479DF711.5090406@grandegger.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 10.1.0.69 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: l.fu@pengutronix.de X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on metis.extern.pengutronix.de); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1636 Lines: 41 Hi, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: .......... > Do you still get high latencies with: > > CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU_BOOST=y > CONFIG_RCU_TRACE=y > CONFIG_NO_HZ is not set > > With this setting I have not yet realized latencies > 150us. Could you > please give it a try? If I change one of the parameters above, latency > increases in short time. I played through some combination of the RCU options and can back your observation this time: With the rcu Tracer or the priority boost turned off I also could measure reliably extraordinory high latencies. If they are both turned on, no high latencies could be measured. Turning on the dynamic ticker however doesn't seem to cause high latencies during my test runs. Seemed like an rcu issue here. Further such results only appear if the target board is booted with nfsrootfs. (As I already have mentioned several times before), which leads my suspection to rcu usage in nfs implementation. In this case this problem might even be platformindependent. I'd have to do some tests on one of our arm boards later to test this. Since there're no reports like this for other architecture as powerpc till now, I doubt quite if this is verifiable. regards Luotao Fu -- Dipl.-Ing. Luotao Fu | Phone: +49-5121-206917-3 Pengutronix - Linux Solutions for Science and Industry Entwicklungszentrum Nord http://www.pengutronix.de -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/