Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-167593-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:4601:e00::3 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:4601:e00::3;
Date: Fri, 3 May 2024 13:37:20 +0200
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=F6rg_R=F6del?= <joro@8bytes.org>
To: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	linux-coco@lists.linux.dev, svsm-devel@coconut-svsm.dev,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Michael Roth <michael.roth@amd.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [svsm-devel] [PATCH v4 15/15] x86/sev: Allow non-VMPL0 execution
 when an SVSM is present
Message-ID: <ZjTMcC7KTP9xRAqk@8bytes.org>
References: <cover.1713974291.git.thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
 <e377d148acac799f6905fc544fbb8bf2ed76e078.1713974291.git.thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <e377d148acac799f6905fc544fbb8bf2ed76e078.1713974291.git.thomas.lendacky@amd.com>

On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 10:58:11AM -0500, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> +static void __init report_vmpl_level(void)
> +{
> +	if (!cc_platform_has(CC_ATTR_GUEST_SEV_SNP))
> +		return;
> +
> +	pr_info("SNP running at VMPL%u.\n", vmpl);

Nit: Can this be formated more like "SNP running at VMPL-%u"? That makes
it easier to parse for me when looking into dmesg :)

Regards,

	Joerg