Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-167673-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 139.178.88.99 as permitted sender) client-ip=139.178.88.99;
Date: Fri, 3 May 2024 14:11:49 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: "JiaLong.Yang" <jialong.yang@shingroup.cn>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>, shenghui.qu@shingroup.cn,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] Support uncore NI-700 Performance Monitor
Message-ID: <20240503131148.GC18392@willie-the-truck>
References: <cover.1709694173.git.jialong.yang@shingroup.cn>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <cover.1709694173.git.jialong.yang@shingroup.cn>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)

On Wed, Mar 06, 2024 at 02:16:00PM +0800, JiaLong.Yang wrote:
> 1. 
> The MAINTAINERS file should be in dt-bindings or drivers?
> It's needed by the two subpatchs.
> I place it in dt-bindings. So I receive the warning in driver patch.
> 
> 2.
> When using the new macro DEFINE_FREE(), we should ended it without ';'.
> So there is one warning asking me to indentation next statement.
> 
> 3.
> If the file vendor-prefixes.yaml should be submit solely?
> 
> JiaLong.Yang (3):
>   dt-bindings: Add HEXIN Technologies Co., Ltd. vendor prefix
>   dt-bindings: perf: Support uncore NI-700 PMU
>   perf/hx_arm_ni: Support uncore NI-700 PMU

Please can you take a look at Robin's series for this IP?

https://lore.kernel.org/r/cover.1713972897.git.robin.murphy@arm.com

Thanks,

Will