Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-167739-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45e3:2400::1;
Date: Fri, 3 May 2024 19:29:35 +0530
From: Sunil V L <sunilvl@ventanamicro.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org,
	acpica-devel@lists.linux.dev,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@sifive.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org>,
	Robert Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>,
	Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>,
	Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	Atish Kumar Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>,
	Andrei Warkentin <andrei.warkentin@intel.com>,
	Haibo1 Xu <haibo1.xu@intel.com>,
	=?utf-8?B?QmrDtnJuIFTDtnBlbA==?= <bjorn@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 17/17] serial: 8250: Add 8250_acpi driver
Message-ID: <ZjTtx88zk4GvCImk@sunil-laptop>
References: <20240501121742.1215792-1-sunilvl@ventanamicro.com>
 <20240501121742.1215792-18-sunilvl@ventanamicro.com>
 <ZjNaR-YtVTm4pbP7@smile.fi.intel.com>
 <ZjNh0Llcx+0VHevy@sunil-laptop>
 <ZjNmdfR2J6hNnYle@smile.fi.intel.com>
 <ZjN3GQI3gegYOIgS@sunil-laptop>
 <ZjOy2G0qN5G076i0@smile.fi.intel.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <ZjOy2G0qN5G076i0@smile.fi.intel.com>

On Thu, May 02, 2024 at 06:35:52PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thu, May 02, 2024 at 04:50:57PM +0530, Sunil V L wrote:
> > On Thu, May 02, 2024 at 01:09:57PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Thu, May 02, 2024 at 03:20:08PM +0530, Sunil V L wrote:
> > > > On Thu, May 02, 2024 at 12:17:59PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> 
> ...
> 
> > > > This driver is not a duplicate of 8250_pnp. It just relies on UART
> > > > enumerated as platform device instead of using PNP interfaces.
> > > > Isn't it better and simple to have an option to enumerate as platform
> > > > device instead of PNP? 
> > > 
> > > Ah, then extract platform driver first from 8250_core.c.
> > > 
> > Let me know if I understand your suggestion correctly. Do you mean call
> > something like serial8250_acpi_init() from serial8250_init() and
> > register the driver directly in serial8250_acpi_init()?
> 
> Extract the code to be 8250_platform.c and update that file.
> I have locally the extraction of RSA code, I will see if I can help you
> with the rest.
> 
Thanks!. That will be helpful. TBH, I don't understand what to do for
extracting the platform driver code. There are already several vendor
specific UART drivers (ex: 8250_fsl.c) which are enumerated as platform
devices. 8250_core.c looks cleanly supporting such drivers which can
register themselves with the core. For generic UART, DT has 8250_of.c
and ACPI has 8250_pnp.c. But 8250_pnp.c comes with baggage of PNP
contract. So, the driver in this patch is similar to vendor specific
drivers to support generic uart devices which are enumerated as platform
device. I can rename 8250_acpi.c to 8250_platform.c if that is better.

Could you please help with a patch even if not compiled so that I can
understand your suggestion better? 

Thanks for your help!
Sunil