Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-168297-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1;
From: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Chris Morgan <macromorgan@hotmail.com>,
	Yuran Pereira <yuran.pereira@hotmail.com>,
	Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>,
	Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
	Vinay Simha BN <simhavcs@gmail.com>,
	Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>,
	Jessica Zhang <quic_jesszhan@quicinc.com>,
	Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
	Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>,
	Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFT PATCH v2 32/48] drm/panel: jdi-lt070me05000: Stop tracking prepared/enabled
Date: Fri,  3 May 2024 14:33:13 -0700
Message-ID: <20240503143327.RFT.v2.32.I2e991044def6644c18ad8d7d686f4f3006f278de@changeid>
In-Reply-To: <20240503213441.177109-1-dianders@chromium.org>
References: <20240503213441.177109-1-dianders@chromium.org>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

As talked about in commit d2aacaf07395 ("drm/panel: Check for already
prepared/enabled in drm_panel"), we want to remove needless code from
panel drivers that was storing and double-checking the
prepared/enabled state. Even if someone was relying on the
double-check before, that double-check is now in the core and not
needed in individual drivers.

NOTE: as part of this, transition the panel's direct calls to its
disable function in shutdown/remove to call through DRM panel.

Cc: Vinay Simha BN <simhavcs@gmail.com>
Cc: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
---
Note: since we are able to identify that this panel only appears to be
used on Qualcomm boards and we have to touch the shutdown/remove path
in this patch anyway, we could possibly squash this with the next
patch that removes the disable call in shutdown/remove. For now I'm
keeping them separate just to keep the concepts separate.

Changes in v2:
- Only handle 1 panel per patch.
- Split removal of prepared/enabled from handling of remove/shutdown.

 .../gpu/drm/panel/panel-jdi-lt070me05000.c    | 27 ++-----------------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-jdi-lt070me05000.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-jdi-lt070me05000.c
index f9a69f347068..4ddddee6fa1e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-jdi-lt070me05000.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-jdi-lt070me05000.c
@@ -37,9 +37,6 @@ struct jdi_panel {
 	struct gpio_desc *dcdc_en_gpio;
 	struct backlight_device *backlight;
 
-	bool prepared;
-	bool enabled;
-
 	const struct drm_display_mode *mode;
 };
 
@@ -176,13 +173,8 @@ static int jdi_panel_disable(struct drm_panel *panel)
 {
 	struct jdi_panel *jdi = to_jdi_panel(panel);
 
-	if (!jdi->enabled)
-		return 0;
-
 	backlight_disable(jdi->backlight);
 
-	jdi->enabled = false;
-
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -192,9 +184,6 @@ static int jdi_panel_unprepare(struct drm_panel *panel)
 	struct device *dev = &jdi->dsi->dev;
 	int ret;
 
-	if (!jdi->prepared)
-		return 0;
-
 	jdi_panel_off(jdi);
 
 	ret = regulator_bulk_disable(ARRAY_SIZE(jdi->supplies), jdi->supplies);
@@ -207,8 +196,6 @@ static int jdi_panel_unprepare(struct drm_panel *panel)
 
 	gpiod_set_value(jdi->dcdc_en_gpio, 0);
 
-	jdi->prepared = false;
-
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -218,9 +205,6 @@ static int jdi_panel_prepare(struct drm_panel *panel)
 	struct device *dev = &jdi->dsi->dev;
 	int ret;
 
-	if (jdi->prepared)
-		return 0;
-
 	ret = regulator_bulk_enable(ARRAY_SIZE(jdi->supplies), jdi->supplies);
 	if (ret < 0) {
 		dev_err(dev, "regulator enable failed, %d\n", ret);
@@ -250,8 +234,6 @@ static int jdi_panel_prepare(struct drm_panel *panel)
 		goto poweroff;
 	}
 
-	jdi->prepared = true;
-
 	return 0;
 
 poweroff:
@@ -272,13 +254,8 @@ static int jdi_panel_enable(struct drm_panel *panel)
 {
 	struct jdi_panel *jdi = to_jdi_panel(panel);
 
-	if (jdi->enabled)
-		return 0;
-
 	backlight_enable(jdi->backlight);
 
-	jdi->enabled = true;
-
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -475,7 +452,7 @@ static void jdi_panel_remove(struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi)
 	struct jdi_panel *jdi = mipi_dsi_get_drvdata(dsi);
 	int ret;
 
-	ret = jdi_panel_disable(&jdi->base);
+	ret = drm_panel_disable(&jdi->base);
 	if (ret < 0)
 		dev_err(&dsi->dev, "failed to disable panel: %d\n", ret);
 
@@ -491,7 +468,7 @@ static void jdi_panel_shutdown(struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi)
 {
 	struct jdi_panel *jdi = mipi_dsi_get_drvdata(dsi);
 
-	jdi_panel_disable(&jdi->base);
+	drm_panel_disable(&jdi->base);
 }
 
 static struct mipi_dsi_driver jdi_panel_driver = {
-- 
2.45.0.rc1.225.g2a3ae87e7f-goog