Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-168710-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.80.249 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.80.249;
Precedence: bulk
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Date: Sat, 04 May 2024 17:51:33 +0300
Message-Id: <D10Y0V64JXG8.1F6S3OZDACCGF@kernel.org>
To: "Ben Boeckel" <me@benboeckel.net>
Cc: "Ignat Korchagin" <ignat@cloudflare.com>, "James Bottomley"
 <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>, "Mimi Zohar"
 <zohar@linux.ibm.com>, "David Howells" <dhowells@redhat.com>, "Paul Moore"
 <paul@paul-moore.com>, "James Morris" <jmorris@namei.org>,
 <serge@hallyn.com>, <linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org>,
 <keyrings@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
 <kernel-team@cloudflare.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] TPM derived keys
From: "Jarkko Sakkinen" <jarkko@kernel.org>
References: <20240503221634.44274-1-ignat@cloudflare.com>
 <D10FIGJ84Q71.2VT5MH1VUDP0R@kernel.org> <ZjY-UU8pROnwlTuH@farprobe>
In-Reply-To: <ZjY-UU8pROnwlTuH@farprobe>

On Sat May 4, 2024 at 4:55 PM EEST, Ben Boeckel wrote:
> On Sat, May 04, 2024 at 03:21:11 +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > I have no idea for what the key created with this is even used, which
> > makes this impossible to review.
>
> Additionally, there is nothing in Documentation/ for how userspace might
> use or create them. This includes things like their description format
> and describing available options.

The whole user story is plain out broken. Documenting a feature that has
no provable use case won't fix that part.

So it is better to start with the cover letter. With the *existing*
knowledge of the *real* issue I don't think we need this tbh.

BR, Jarkko