Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-168728-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:40f1:3f00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:40f1:3f00::1;
Date: Sat, 4 May 2024 17:33:59 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] ioctl()-based API to query VMAs from /proc/<pid>/maps
Message-ID: <2024050424-drift-evil-27de@gregkh>
References: <20240504003006.3303334-1-andrii@kernel.org>
 <20240504-rasch-gekrochen-3d577084beda@brauner>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20240504-rasch-gekrochen-3d577084beda@brauner>

On Sat, May 04, 2024 at 01:24:23PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:
> On Fri, May 03, 2024 at 05:30:01PM -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> > Implement binary ioctl()-based interface to /proc/<pid>/maps file to allow
> > applications to query VMA information more efficiently than through textual
> > processing of /proc/<pid>/maps contents. See patch #2 for the context,
> > justification, and nuances of the API design.
> > 
> > Patch #1 is a refactoring to keep VMA name logic determination in one place.
> > Patch #2 is the meat of kernel-side API.
> > Patch #3 just syncs UAPI header (linux/fs.h) into tools/include.
> > Patch #4 adjusts BPF selftests logic that currently parses /proc/<pid>/maps to
> > optionally use this new ioctl()-based API, if supported.
> > Patch #5 implements a simple C tool to demonstrate intended efficient use (for
> > both textual and binary interfaces) and allows benchmarking them. Patch itself
> > also has performance numbers of a test based on one of the medium-sized
> > internal applications taken from production.
> 
> I don't have anything against adding a binary interface for this. But
> it's somewhat odd to do ioctls based on /proc files. I wonder if there
> isn't a more suitable place for this. prctl()? New vmstat() system call
> using a pidfd/pid as reference? ioctl() on fs/pidfs.c?

See my objection to the ioctl api in the patch review itself.

Also, as this is a new user/kernel api, it needs loads of documentation
(there was none), and probably also cc: linux-api, right?

thanks,

greg k-h