Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-169475-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45e3:2400::1;
Date: Mon, 6 May 2024 10:12:35 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Oliver Sang <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>, oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev,
	lkp@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Srikanth Aithal <sraithal@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/alternatives] [x86/alternatives] ee8962082a:
 WARNING:at_arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpuid-deps.c:#do_clear_cpu_cap
Message-ID: <20240506081235.GCZjiQ8-MC7wL7Ue8z@fat_crate.local>
References: <202404302233.f27f91b2-oliver.sang@intel.com>
 <20240430172313.GCZjEpAfUECkEZ9S5L@fat_crate.local>
 <ZjE7DkTBSbPlBN8k@google.com>
 <20240430193211.GEZjFHO0ayDXtgvbE7@fat_crate.local>
 <ZjFLpkgI3Zl4dsXs@google.com>
 <20240430223305.GFZjFxoSha7S5BYbIu@fat_crate.local>
 <20240504124822.GAZjYulrGPPX_4w4zK@fat_crate.local>
 <ZjiCJz4myN2DLnZ5@xsang-OptiPlex-9020>
 <20240506073903.GAZjiJF7BQyjYJQLYx@fat_crate.local>
 <20240506080156.GBZjiOdHjn-NdmbnTw@fat_crate.local>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20240506080156.GBZjiOdHjn-NdmbnTw@fat_crate.local>

Oliver,

does the warning go away when you run *only* the second patch?

I.e., this one:

https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240504125040.GCZjYvIAK9_DzKuHXh@fat_crate.local

?

I think in this case, it'll make sure that the misconfigured system is
"reconfigured" properly wrt VMX etc...

Can you pls send dmesg and /proc/cpuinfo from that run?

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette