Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-170102-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:4601:e00::3 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:4601:e00::3;
Message-ID: <82f5b8e3-45c4-4b59-bc96-4cee2b122e9a@linux.microsoft.com>
Date: Mon, 6 May 2024 08:54:47 -0700
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 10/12] sfc: falcon: Make I2C terminology more inclusive
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: Edward Cree <ecree.xilinx@gmail.com>,
 Martin Habets <habetsm.xilinx@gmail.com>,
 "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
 Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
 "open list:SFC NETWORK DRIVER" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
 "open list:SFC NETWORK DRIVER" <linux-net-drivers@amd.com>,
 open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
 Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>,
 "open list:RADEON and AMDGPU DRM DRIVERS" <amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
 "open list:DRM DRIVERS" <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
 "open list:INTEL DRM DISPLAY FOR XE AND I915 DRIVERS"
 <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
 "open list:INTEL DRM DISPLAY FOR XE AND I915 DRIVERS"
 <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>,
 "open list:DRM DRIVER FOR NVIDIA GEFORCE/QUADRO GPUS"
 <nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org>,
 "open list:I2C SUBSYSTEM HOST DRIVERS" <linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>,
 "open list:BTTV VIDEO4LINUX DRIVER" <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>,
 "open list:FRAMEBUFFER LAYER" <linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org>
References: <20240430173812.1423757-1-eahariha@linux.microsoft.com>
 <20240430173812.1423757-11-eahariha@linux.microsoft.com>
 <20240503151300.0f202c30@kernel.org>
Content-Language: en-CA
From: Easwar Hariharan <eahariha@linux.microsoft.com>
In-Reply-To: <20240503151300.0f202c30@kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 5/3/2024 3:13 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Apr 2024 17:38:09 +0000 Easwar Hariharan wrote:
>> I2C v7, SMBus 3.2, and I3C 1.1.1 specifications have replaced "master/slave"
>> with more appropriate terms. Inspired by and following on to Wolfram's
>> series to fix drivers/i2c/[1], fix the terminology for users of
>> I2C_ALGOBIT bitbanging interface, now that the approved verbiage exists
>> in the specification.
>>
>> Compile tested, no functionality changes intended
> 
> FWIW we're assuming someone (Wolfram?) will take all of these,
> instead of area maintainers picking them individually.
> Please let us know if that's incorrect.

I think, based on the trend in the v2 conversation[1], that's correct. If maintainers of
other areas disagree, please chime in.

Thanks,
Easwar

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240503181333.2336999-1-eahariha@linux.microsoft.com/