Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-170218-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45e3:2400::1;
Date: Mon, 6 May 2024 10:04:06 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Micka=EBl_Sala=FCn?= <mic@digikod.net>
Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Shengyu Li <shengyu.li.evgeny@gmail.com>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>,
	Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>,
	David Gow <davidgow@google.com>,
	"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>,
	=?iso-8859-1?Q?G=FCnther?= Noack <gnoack@google.com>,
	Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>, Ron Economos <re@w6rz.net>,
	Ronald Warsow <rwarsow@gmx.de>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>,
	kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/10] Fix Kselftest's vfork() side effects
Message-ID: <202405061002.01D399877A@keescook>
References: <20240506165518.474504-1-mic@digikod.net>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <20240506165518.474504-1-mic@digikod.net>

On Mon, May 06, 2024 at 06:55:08PM +0200, Micka?l Sala?n wrote:
> Shuah, I think this should be in -next really soon to make sure
> everything works fine for the v6.9 release, which is not currently the
> case.  I cannot test against all kselftests though.  I would prefer to
> let you handle this, but I guess you're not able to do so and I'll push
> it on my branch without reply from you.  Even if I push it on my branch,
> please push it on yours too as soon as you see this and I'll remove it
> from mine.

Yes, please. Getting this into v6.9 is preferred, but at least into the
coming v6.10 merge window is important. :)

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook