Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-170445-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 139.178.88.99 as permitted sender) client-ip=139.178.88.99;
From: Levi Yun <ppbuk5246@gmail.com>
To: anna-maria@linutronix.de,
	frederic@kernel.org,
	mingo@kernel.org,
	tglx@linutronix.de
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Levi Yun <ppbuk5246@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH] time/tick-sched: enable idle load balancing when nohz_full cpu becomes idle.
Date: Mon,  6 May 2024 22:31:50 +0100
Message-ID: <20240506213150.13608-1-ppbuk5246@gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

When nohz_full CPU stops tick in tick_nohz_irq_exit(),
It wouldn't be chosen to perform idle load balancing bacause it doesn't
call nohz_balance_enter_idle() in tick_nohz_idle_stop_tick() when it
becomes idle.

tick_nohz_idle_stop_tick() is only called in idle state and
nohz_balance_enter_idle() tracks the CPU is part of nohz.idle_cpus_mask
with rq->nohz_tick_stopped.

So, nohz_balance_enter_idle() could be called safely without !was_stooped
check.

Signed-off-by: Levi Yun <ppbuk5246@gmail.com>
---
 kernel/time/tick-sched.c | 6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
index 71a792cd8936..31a4cd89782f 100644
--- a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
+++ b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
@@ -1228,8 +1228,10 @@ void tick_nohz_idle_stop_tick(void)
 		ts->idle_sleeps++;
 		ts->idle_expires = expires;

-		if (!was_stopped && tick_sched_flag_test(ts, TS_FLAG_STOPPED)) {
-			ts->idle_jiffies = ts->last_jiffies;
+		if (tick_sched_flag_test(ts, TS_FLAG_STOPPED)) {
+			if (!was_stopped)
+				ts->idle_jiffies = ts->last_jiffies;
+
 			nohz_balance_enter_idle(cpu);
 		}
 	} else {
--
2.41.0