Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 19:25:53 -0800
From: Yinghai Lu <Yinghai.Lu@Sun.COM>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] x86_64: increse MAX_EARLY_RES for NODE_DATA and bootmap
In-reply-to: <200801300357.54924.ak@suse.de>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>,
       Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Message-id: <200801291925.53726.yinghai.lu@sun.com>
Organization: SUN
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Content-disposition: inline
References: <200801291113.35974.yinghai.lu@sun.com>
 <200801291116.31729.yinghai.lu@sun.com> <200801300357.54924.ak@suse.de>
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 20070904.708012)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 931
Lines: 25

On Tuesday 29 January 2008 06:57:54 pm Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Tuesday 29 January 2008 20:16, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> > [PATCH 4/4] x86_64: increse MAX_EARLY_RES for NODE_DATA and bootmap
> >
> > otherise early_node_mem will use up these for 8 nodes system
> 
> Yes this was the problem with my early_reserve node bootmem patch.
> It adds a node limit.
> 
> But even with increasing the limit is far too small. Probably best to not 
> use the patch. In theory it should not have been needed anyways because
> there is no need to reserve here because there are no interfering users.
> 
> Whatever your problem is it needs to be solved differently.

ok, discard 3, and 4.

how about 2 v2?

YH
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/