Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-171925-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.199.223 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.199.223;
Date: Tue, 7 May 2024 10:38:43 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Lance Yang <ioworker0@gmail.com>, Baolin Wang
 <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>, willy@infradead.org, sj@kernel.org,
 maskray@google.com, ziy@nvidia.com, ryan.roberts@arm.com,
 21cnbao@gmail.com, mhocko@suse.com, fengwei.yin@intel.com,
 zokeefe@google.com, shy828301@gmail.com, xiehuan09@gmail.com,
 libang.li@antgroup.com, wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com,
 songmuchun@bytedance.com, peterx@redhat.com, minchan@kernel.org,
 linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] mm/rmap: integrate PMD-mapped folio splitting
 into pagewalk loop
Message-Id: <20240507103843.d15414e356d60612f94ec6ce@linux-foundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <19645506-f17d-4202-807e-f0e5c99af742@redhat.com>
References: <20240501042700.83974-1-ioworker0@gmail.com>
	<20240501042700.83974-3-ioworker0@gmail.com>
	<cc9fd23f-7d87-48a7-a737-acbea8e95fb7@linux.alibaba.com>
	<CAK1f24kyCj2Svguuu07wDuVEWYYbcmRc_18ihgVAzSjoJ9ox2A@mail.gmail.com>
	<a8f7a8da-c2e1-443c-9220-a224d97b1c81@redhat.com>
	<CAK1f24=rWdgscbDa6pMqOmTEDOHVLo5NQ=7jOo9TdyJRXahHZg@mail.gmail.com>
	<20240507102241.0a09db69afd62efb5ce84f17@linux-foundation.org>
	<19645506-f17d-4202-807e-f0e5c99af742@redhat.com>
Precedence: bulk
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Tue, 7 May 2024 19:33:05 +0200 David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> wrote:

> > Well, which series are we talking about?  "mm/madvise: enhance
> > lazyfreeing with mTHP in madvise_free v10" or ""Reclaim lazyfree THP
> > without splitting v4" or both?
> 
> See my other mail, "mm/madvise: enhance lazyfreeing with mTHP in 
> madvise_free v10" is all acked/reviewed and good to go.
> 
> > 
> > And how significant are the needed fixup patches?
> > 
> > And what is our confidence level after those fixups are in place?
> 
> I'm afraid I won't have time to review this series this/next week, so I 
> cannot tell. I already assumed this would not be 6.10 material.

OK, I've dropped the series "Reclaim lazyfree THP without splitting",
v4.  Let's revisit in the next cycle.