Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-173371-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 139.178.88.99 as permitted sender) client-ip=139.178.88.99;
Date: Wed, 8 May 2024 06:54:36 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Jeffrey Altman <jaltman@auristor.com>, David Howells
 <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>, "David
 S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>, Paolo
 Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, linux-afs@lists.infradead.org,
 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 0/5] rxrpc: Miscellaneous fixes
Message-ID: <20240508065436.2f0c07e9@kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <955B77FD-C0C2-479E-9D85-D2F62E3DA48C@auristor.com>
References: <20240503150749.1001323-1-dhowells@redhat.com>
	<20240507194447.20bcfb60@kernel.org>
	<955B77FD-C0C2-479E-9D85-D2F62E3DA48C@auristor.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Wed, 8 May 2024 01:57:43 -0600 Jeffrey Altman wrote:
> > Looks like these got marked as Rejected in patchwork.
> > I think either because lore is confused and attaches an exchange with
> > DaveM from 2022 to them (?) or because I mentioned to DaveM that I'm
> > not sure these are fixes. So let me ask - on a scale of 1 to 10, how
> > convinced are you that these should go to Linus this week rather than
> > being categorized as general improvements and go during the merge
> > window (without the Fixes tags)?  
> 
> Jakub,
> 
> In my opinion, the first two patches in the series I believe are important to back port to the stable branches.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Jeffrey Altman <jaltman@auristor.com <mailto:jaltman@auristor.com>>

Are they regressions? Seems possible from the Fixes tag but unclear
from the text of the commit messages.

In any case, taking the first two may be a reasonable compromise.
Does it sounds good to you, David?