Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-173381-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.48.161 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.48.161;
Date: Wed, 8 May 2024 15:02:08 +0100
From: Daniel Golle <daniel@makrotopia.org>
To: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>, Sky Huang <SkyLake.Huang@mediatek.com>,
	Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Qingfang Deng <dqfext@gmail.com>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
	Steven Liu <Steven.Liu@mediatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] net: phy: mediatek: Add mtk phy lib for token ring
 access & LED/other manipulations
Message-ID: <ZjuF4L8xIwDqyMad@makrotopia.org>
References: <20240425023325.15586-1-SkyLake.Huang@mediatek.com>
 <20240425023325.15586-3-SkyLake.Huang@mediatek.com>
 <Zjo9SZiGKDUf2Kwx@makrotopia.org>
 <a005409e-255e-4633-a58c-6c29e6708b34@lunn.ch>
 <Zjt5iobHklvrVgtB@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Zjt5iobHklvrVgtB@shell.armlinux.org.uk>

On Wed, May 08, 2024 at 02:09:30PM +0100, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> On Wed, May 08, 2024 at 02:25:56PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > Please trim the email when replying to just what is relevant. If i
> > need to page down lots of time to find a comment it is possible i will
> > skip write passed a comment...
> 
> +1. There are _too_ _many_ people on netdev who just don't bother to do
> this, and it's getting to the point where if people can't be bothered
> to make it easier for me to engage with them, I'm just not going to be
> bothered engaging with them. People need to realise that this is a two-
> way thing, and stop making reviewers have extra work trying to find
> their one or two line comment buried in a few hundred lines of irrevant
> content. I might just send a reply, top posting, stating I can't be
> bothered to read their email.

Sorry about that, note taken. I'll take better care of that in future.