Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-173643-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.80.249 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.80.249;
Message-ID: <716be276-077e-4200-9581-eeb1c1899d20@gaisler.com>
Date: Wed, 8 May 2024 19:38:50 +0200
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] Remove onstack cpumask var for sparc
To: Dawei Li <dawei.li@shingroup.cn>, davem@davemloft.net
Cc: sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sam@ravnborg.org
References: <20240424025548.3765250-1-dawei.li@shingroup.cn>
 <2E1672E07EE140B4+Zjok8JvIOXBNZnVJ@centos8>
Content-Language: en-US
From: Andreas Larsson <andreas@gaisler.com>
In-Reply-To: <2E1672E07EE140B4+Zjok8JvIOXBNZnVJ@centos8>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 2024-05-07 14:56, Dawei Li wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
> 
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 10:55:43AM +0800, Dawei Li wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This is v4 of previous series on removal of on-stack cpumask var for
>> sparc arch.
>>
>> Change since v3:
>>
>> - Rebased against for-next of Andreas.
>>
>> - Add Reviewed-by from Sam.
>>
>> - Remove PATCH(sparc/init: Remove on-stack cpumask var).
>>
>> v1:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240418104949.3606645-1-dawei.li@shingroup.cn/
>>
>> v2:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240420051547.3681642-1-dawei.li@shingroup.cn/
>>
>> v3:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240423083043.3735921-1-dawei.li@shingroup.cn/
>>
>> Dawei Li (5):
>>   sparc/srmmu: Remove on-stack cpumask var
>>   sparc/irq: Remove on-stack cpumask var
>>   sparc/of: Remove on-stack cpumask var
>>   sparc/pci_msi: Remove on-stack cpumask var
>>   sparc/leon: Remove on-stack cpumask var
>>
>>  arch/sparc/kernel/irq_64.c       | 10 +++-----
>>  arch/sparc/kernel/leon_kernel.c  |  7 +++---
>>  arch/sparc/kernel/of_device_64.c |  5 +---
>>  arch/sparc/kernel/pci_msi.c      |  5 +---
>>  arch/sparc/mm/srmmu.c            | 40 ++++++++++----------------------
>>  5 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
> 
> Any chance of getting this series queued up for v6.10?
Yes. Picking the series up to my for-next.

Reviewed-by: Andreas Larsson <andreas@gaisler.com>

Thanks,
Andreas